The Trump administration deported eight migrants to South Sudan, based on a Division of Homeland Safety official, after the administration needed to halt their deportation to a base in Djibouti.
“A district decide can not dictate the nationwide safety and international coverage of america of America,” Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated to ABC Information. “This Independence Day marks one other victory for the security and safety of the American individuals.”
The airplane landed in South Sudan simply earlier than midnight EST on Friday.
The eight migrants, who DHS has alleged have critical prison convictions, have been the topic of a lawsuit that had halted their deportation to South Sudan and diverted them to a U.S. army base in Djibouti.
On this Dec. 21, 2024, file photograph, an aerial view of Djibouti, East Africa is proven.
Ludovic Marin/AFP by way of Getty Pictures, FILE
The conditions at the base, based on courtroom filings, have been each difficult for the detainees and ICE officers who have been tasked with watching them.
The lawsuit made all of it the best way as much as the Supreme Court docket and the courtroom dominated that the Trump administration was not sure by a decrease courtroom order to maintain them at a army facility in Djibouti.
In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court docket on Thursday clarified that the noncitizens the Trump administration moved to deport to South Sudan — and has since held briefly in Djibouti in authorized limbo — is just not sure by a decrease courtroom order to maintain them there as authorized proceedings play out.
The choice is one other win for the Trump administration and its unprecedented effort to deport immigrants to nations with which they haven’t any ties and the place they might face mistreatment.
The Supreme Court docket in Washington, D.C., June 27, 2025.
Alex Wroblewski/AFP by way of Getty Pictures
In an unsigned opinion, the Supreme Court docket defined that when it lifted judge-imposed due course of necessities for third-country removals final month the federal government can now not be held to account for allegedly violating the necessities.
One of many attorneys representing the group of males known as their deportation to South Sudan “punitive and unconstitutional.”
“Due to the Supreme Court docket’s procedural ruling, these males have been denied a chance to contest their deportations to South Sudan based mostly on their worry of torture or dying,” stated Trina Realmuto in an announcement to ABC Information. “The U.S. State Division warns People towards all journey to South Sudan but deported these males there with none due course of. Make no mistake about it, these deportations have been punitive and unconstitutional.”
-ABC Information’ Laura Romero contributed to this report.
