Some sturdy “will they, received’t they” pressure might make for nice rom-com basis, however the dynamic is much from what you’d count on of a licensing group. After a disastrous experimental February rollout led the California Bar again to an orthodox NBCE check administration, future check takers and rubbernecking out-of-state voyeurs wish to understand how the Cali Bar will deal with the subsequent bar examination. Bloomberg Regulation has protection:
California State Bar leaders confirmed deep divisions Thursday on the way forward for the bar examination, because the clock ticks for them to resolve whether or not, after their first try failed, they’ll strive once more to develop a check distinctive to the Golden State.
The bar has three choices, workers mentioned: Utilizing questions developed by the seller that wrote the majority of questions on the February check briefly, as a “bridge” to creating a brand new examination; adopting the Nationwide Convention of Bar Examiners’ NextGen check; or creating a brand new, everlasting examination that may very well be streamlined like Nevada’s shorter 100-question a number of selection check that’s in growth.
A few procedural questions. About these vendor questions, did somebody bear in mind to jot down which questions had been written by a reliable evaluator fairly than a big language mannequin liable to hallucinating authorized options? Because they didn’t do the best job of regulating that the last time they went the vendor route. The second query applies to each NCBE adoption and the R&D route of creating a brand new check from new fabric: didn’t all of this begin as a result of the California Bar’s funds was gunning for the pink? It seems like adopting the NCBE would lower losses and put them again on monitor to chapter. A brand new check has some promise, however even for those who had been to look previous the related prices of creating a brand new check, it isn’t just like the Cali Bar has the very best monitor document with beginning over from scratch.
Whereas the Committee of Bar Examiners have a while to weigh their choices transferring ahead, they nonetheless have obstacles to face. One answer, to extend the bar charge by $150 per head to assist with the funds, was shot down. No matter they finally plan to do, that plan has to then be accredited by the California Supreme Courtroom. Looks as if a rubber-stamping scenario at first look, however their Supreme Courtroom has already sent them back to the drawing board in recent history.
Better of luck to the oldsters answerable for the Cali Bar. Godspeed to the long run check takers that must cope with the results.
California Bar Splinters on Bar Exam’s Future as Deadline Looms [Bloomberg Law]
Earlier: California Bar Reveals It Used AI For Exam Questions, Because Of Course It Did
California Needs To Focus On Procedurals Before Administering Bar Replacement

Chris Williams grew to become a social media supervisor and assistant editor for Above the Regulation in June 2021. Previous to becoming a member of the workers, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ within the Fb group Regulation Faculty Memes for Edgy T14s . He endured Missouri lengthy sufficient to graduate from Washington College in St. Louis Faculty of Regulation. He’s a former boatbuilder who’s studying to swim, is desirous about vital race idea, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for biking that sometimes annoys his friends. You possibly can attain him by e mail at [email protected] and by tweet at @WritesForRent.