Again in 2022, I warned that the British pound would fall beneath par, and that isn’t over. “We won’t see a straight decline into 2026/2027, however that’s the place that is headed. The best help might be on the 72 to 76 stage by then…” The intense help by 2027 lies at 51 cents. That will are likely to suggest they lose in opposition to Russia. Breaking the 1985 low of $1.03 will then level to the 89 space.” After that, it’s a meltdown. That is the hallmark of LABOUR, which is a direct assumption from Karl Marx that we’re simply financial slaves, and after they created the EU, they made certain that there was no proper of the folks to decide on a brand new authorities. They get to vote just for a Parliament that’s for present and lacks any energy to make a single legislation.
I warned ultimately yr’s WEC in Orlando that the pc was projected to be the demise of the Democratic Social gathering. They’re deeply divided and refuse to even hearken to any criticism of what they stand for, from transgender to open borders, which was NOT what the American folks needed. No less than we retain the fitting to alter management, not like Parliamentary techniques and the European Union.
This music, We Gained’t Again Down, brings tears to the eyes of patriots. The primary worldwide panic os 1683 was the try of the Ottoman Empire to beat Europe. The turmoil of the Balkans is drenched in blood. The Ottoman Empire did have interaction in compelled non secular conversions within the Balkans, however this was not a constant, empire-wide coverage all through its total historical past. The character and scale of conversion various dramatically by time, place, and circumstance.
Opposite to in style delusion, the Ottoman Empire’s major strategy to non-Muslims was not compelled conversion economically. The state was organized below the Millet System, which granted non secular communities (Orthodox Christians, Armenian Christians, Jews) a big diploma of autonomy that got here with a worth. They may observe their faith, run their very own courts for private legislation, and acquire their very own taxes. Nevertheless, Non-Muslims paid a particular tax referred to as the jizya. Mass conversion would have drastically lowered state income. They conquered and transformed the non-Muslims into financial slaves.
The numerous Muslim presence within the UK started on account of migration waves that occurred a long time in the past, primarily from the Nineteen Fifties to the Seventies. The first sources have been from South Asia (Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India), the place post-war labour migration crammed jobs in Britain’s industrial centres like Birmingham, Bradford, and Manchester.
The 340-year cycle from the 1683 try to beat Europe by the Ottoman Empire was 2023. The yr 2023 was notable for irregular migration, particularly small boat crossings throughout the English Channel. Nevertheless, the information doesn’t help the concept this was a “main inflow of Muslims.” The highest nationalities arriving by small boats in 2023 have been Albanians, Afghans, Iranians, Iraqis, and Syrians. The difficulty is just not that they’re Muslim. India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh have been international locations that had been Westernized by British occupation and the rule of legislation. So these migrants assimilated culturally. These new teams are clashing, demanding to carry their tradition to Britain, even altering the rule of legislation.
Starmer has certainly destroyed the whole lot that Britain as soon as stood for. One factor that Margaret Thatcher stated to me throughout certainly one of our conversations was that Britain’s most extraordinary present to Asia was the rule of legislation. She was appropriate insofar as, with out the rule of legislation, funding turns into unimaginable. These migrants are coming from Albania, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and Syria, none of which magnetize severe worldwide funding as a result of they lack the respect for the rule of legislation, and thus making choices on trillion greenback portfolios, that have been international locations that I might NEVER take into account as a result of there was no authorized system even to safe the title to property.
I’m sorry. I’ve shed a tear for Britain. I used to be requested when Starmer was coming to energy if I’d come over and meet. I declined. Solely a idiot tries to persuade one other idiot he’s a idiot. There isn’t any proof that I might ever current to Starmer that may persuade him he’s destroying Britain. He would by no means hear and doubtless throw me in jail free of charge speech, which he has extinguished and certainly now guidelines Britain out of concern, like several tyrant. If neither the police nor the navy stand up, then Britain won’t ever once more find a way even to make use of the phrase “Nice.”
Æthelstan (dominated 924-939), who’s broadly thought to be the primary true King of England. He wasn’t “united athered,” however he united the assorted Anglo-Saxon kingdoms below one rule. Starmer appeared on the 128th interval of the 8.6-year cycle, from 924AD.
The UK started with the merger of England and Scotland in 1707.33 (Might 1st, 1707). The 309.6-year cycle from that union marked BRIXT 2016.93. That alone confirmed that BRIXT would win.
On the finish of 2016, the federal government, below new Prime Minister Theresa Might, argued it had the “prerogative energy” to set off Article 50 (the formal mechanism for leaving the EU) and not using a vote in Parliament. A authorized problem was mounted, arguing that solely Parliament, because the sovereign physique, might take away rights that it had initially been granted (EU-derived rights). The Excessive Court docket Ruling (November 3, 2016) held that Parliament should vote to authorize the triggering of Article 50. This was a significant blow to Theresa Might’s plan for a swift and executive-led Brexit. The Supreme Court docket Attraction (January 24, 2017) noticed the federal government enchantment of the choice, however the Supreme Court docket upheld the ruling by a majority of 8 to three. The court docket confirmed that an Act of Parliament was required earlier than Article 50 might be invoked.
In a significant landmark speech on January seventeenth, 2017, Prime Minister Theresa Might set out her authorities’s 12-point plan for Brexit, clarifying for the primary time the UK’s core aims. Following the Supreme Court docket ruling, the federal government launched the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Invoice—a brief invoice to present Theresa Might the ability to set off Article 50. The invoice handed its first vote within the Home of Commons on February 1, 2017, by a majority of 384. It then confronted a extra formidable problem within the Home of Lords, which tried so as to add amendments (e.g., to ensure the rights of EU residents). Nevertheless, the federal government overturned these amendments, and the invoice obtained Royal Assent on March sixteenth, 2017.
Whereas 2032 is a significant world turning level, 309.6 years earlier than was 1722, and the uncovering of the Atterbury Plot (also called the Layer Plot). That was the Jacobite conspiracy to overthrow the brand new Hanoverian King George I and restore the Stuart line within the individual of James Francis Edward Stuart III (the “Outdated Pretender”).
