WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court mentioned on Monday that it’s going to take into account whether or not individuals who frequently smoke marijuana can legally personal weapons, the newest firearm case to come back earlier than the court docket since its 2022 decision expanding gun rights.
President Donald Trump’s administration requested the justices to revive a case in opposition to a Texas man charged with a felony as a result of he allegedly had a gun in his residence and acknowledged being an everyday pot consumer. The Justice Division appealed after a lower court largely struck down a legislation that bars individuals who use any unlawful medicine from having weapons.
Arguments most likely will happen early in 2026, with a call seemingly by early summer time.
The Republican administration favors Second Modification rights, however authorities attorneys argued that this ban is a justifiable restriction.
They requested the court docket to reinstate a case in opposition to Ali Danial Hemani. His legal professionals acquired the felony cost tossed out after the fifth U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals discovered that the blanket ban is unconstitutional beneath the Supreme Court docket’s expanded view of gun rights. The appellate judges discovered it may nonetheless be used in opposition to individuals accused of being excessive and armed on the identical time, although.
Hemani’s attorneys argue the broadly written legislation places thousands and thousands of individuals susceptible to technical violations since no less than 20% of People have tried pot, in response to authorities well being knowledge. About half of states legalized leisure marijuana, however it’s nonetheless unlawful beneath federal legislation.
The Justice Division argues the legislation is legitimate when used in opposition to common drug customers as a result of they pose a severe public security threat. The federal government mentioned the FBI discovered Hemani’s gun and cocaine in a search of his residence as they probed journey and communications allegedly linked to Iran. The gun cost was the one one filed, nonetheless, and his legal professionals mentioned the opposite allegations have been irrelevant and have been talked about solely to make him appear extra harmful.
The case marks one other flashpoint within the utility of the Supreme Court docket’s new take a look at for firearm restrictions. The conservative majority present in 2022 that the Second Modification typically offers individuals the best to hold weapons in public for self-defense and any firearm restrictions should have a powerful grounding within the nation’s historical past.
The landmark 2022 ruling led to a cascade of challenges to firearm legal guidelines across the nation, although the justices have since upheld a different federal law supposed to guard victims of home violence by barring weapons from individuals beneath restraining orders.
___
Observe the AP’s protection of the U.S. Supreme Court docket at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.
