Trump’s defeat over the Epstein information was a uncommon occasion of Congress defying his authoritarianism. However the resistance continues to be feeble.
President Donald Trump speaks throughout an official dinner with Crown Prince and Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman within the East Room of the White Home in Washington, DC, on November 18, 2025.
(Brendan Smialowski / AFP by way of Getty Photographs)
Each time Donald Trump faces a lack of energy, he unleashes threats of violence in opposition to his foes. (When he truly does lose energy, these threats flip very actual, as anybody who lived by January 6 is aware of.) So it made sense that, after being comprehensively defeated in his battle to cease Congress from voting to launch extra Jeffrey Epstein information, a weakened and humiliated Trump cranked up the violent rhetoric in response to a video from six congressional Democrats.,
Within the video, the Democrats, all veterans, reminded members of the army that they’ve an obligation to withstand illegal orders. Trump responded with a frothing Reality Social submit that said, “It’s referred to as SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL. Every one in every of these traitors to our Nation must be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL.” One other post read: “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” White Home spokesperson Karoline Leavitt subsequently denied in a press convention that Trump needs to execute members of Congress. Home Speaker Mike Johnson, with typical obsequiousness, defended Trump’s feedback as an applicable response to the Democrats. Johnson added that Trump was merely “defining the crime of sedition.”
Trump’s posts are in fact unhinged, however in a wierd method they, together with the passage of the Epstein Information Transparency Act, may very well be an indication of constitutional well being—or, a minimum of, a reminder that the democratic buildings of america haven’t utterly collapsed.
The lawless authoritarianism of Trump’s second time period in workplace has occurred partially as a result of, opposite to long-standing political traditions, he has not often confronted pushback from the present checks on presidential energy—whether or not from the coequal branches of presidency in Congress and the courts, or from civil society extra broadly.
The judiciary and the legislature are the one two establishments with the constitutional authority to thwart Trump’s lawlessness. However, due to many years of Republican presidents (together with Trump himself) stacking the courts with rabidly partisan judges who consider within the concept of the “unitary executive,” Trump not often faces any critical curtailment of his agenda by the judiciary. Congress has been, if something, much more servile due to the partisanship of GOP lawmakers.
Present Subject
The imperial presidency is, in fact, an issue that lengthy predates Trump. The time period was popularized by the late historian Arthur M. Schlessinger Jr. in his 1973 book The Imperial Presidency, which linked the Watergate scandal to many years of political centralization within the govt department on the expense of Congress. Whereas there was some rollback of the imperial presidency within the wake of Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974, this reassertion of congressional checks was transient; by the point Ronald Reagan took workplace within the early Nineteen Eighties, the pendulum was already swinging again to the pre-Watergate norm. The Iran-contra scandal, which noticed the White Home overtly defying the regulation as a way to fund army help that Congress had refused to assist, was an indication that the imperial presidency was again in full power—a actuality that was strengthened by the truth that lots of the perpetrators of the Iran-contra acquired solely a slap on the wrist and had been subsequently pardoned by President George H.W. Bush.
Militarism has lengthy been a power driving the imperial presidency, with the argument that the commander in chief wants a free hand in issues of conflict providing a prepared excuse for overriding congressional energy. Naturally, this perception solely grew stronger after the 9/11 terrorist assault turned President George W. Bush into an all-too-eager wartime president.
In an vital, newly printed essay in The Political Science Quarterly, Eric Schickler, a scholar on the College of California–Berkeley, argued that “nationalized polarization” has additionally led to Congress turning into extra submissive. In accordance with Schickler, “The absence of great congressional scrutiny of the faltering American effort in Iraq in 2003–2006 was a harbinger of the emergent dynamic by which get together and committee leaders’ overriding dedication is to defend their get together’s president.”
Donald Trump rose to energy on this extra polarized political system and has used it to claim presidential energy in ways in which earlier generations would have seen as unlawful. As Schickler summarizes:
Donald Trump supercharged this shift in incentives. With only a few exceptions, the primary important rule if one needs to outlive a Republican major has been the identical no matter one’s district: “Don’t anger Donald Trump or his supporters.” These incentives enabled Trump to undertake a method of all-out resistance within the face of Democratic-led investigations in 2019–2020. With Republicans unified behind him, Trump might order a blanket refusal to obey congressional subpoenas and face little political pushback. Republicans’ cohesion behind Trump undercut one of many important mechanisms by which investigations had, prior to now, formed public opinion: voters didn’t replace their views of the president when the indicators they acquired broke completely on get together strains. Trump’s approval ranking didn’t budge in the course of the first impeachment battle. Even Trump’s second impeachment strengthened the teachings of his first time period: the handful of Republicans who voted to convict had been much more more likely to face detrimental repercussions on the polls (and, at occasions, dying threats fueled by social media activists impressed by Trump) than the overwhelming majority who voted to acquit. Within the aftermath of that vote, it turned clear that Congress’s impeachment energy is actually meaningless within the current context. It’s thus inconceivable that Trump might act in a way that will end in his conviction and removing from workplace.
Schickler paints a stark and convincing image of america descending into presidential authoritarianism. It’s in keeping with the best way Trump has run rampant for months, eviscerating federal businesses by fiat, sending troops into American cities, and illegally bombing boats in worldwide waters. Throughout this era, the courts solely fitfully and partly checked Trump, whereas Congress was wholly docile. Additional, lots of the civil establishments which are alleged to function a countervailing energy to the state had been additionally bending the knee to Trump: a sample seen (as Schickler notes) in elite universities, the enterprise neighborhood, and the mainstream media.
It’s in opposition to this report of an out-of-control president that the revolt in opposition to him over the Epstein File Transparency Act takes on its full import. Democratic Consultant Ro Khanna deserves all credit score for taking up the problem and successful the assist of not simply his get together however 4 courageous Republican dissidents: Thomas Massie, Lauren Boebert, Nancy Mace, and Marjorie Taylor Greene. For weeks, they stood alone of their get together as Trump terrorized the vast majority of Republican lawmakers. Finally, the power of public opinion, fueled by the sheer repugnance of Epstein’s crimes and the likelihood that his accomplices would go unpunished, overwhelmed Trump’s stranglehold on the GOP.
The query is: Was the Epstein revolt a one-off occasion or a pivot level? May it herald a bigger flip in opposition to the imperial presidency in its most extremist type?
The New York Occasions reports that there are different indicators congressional Republicans are rising restive about at all times being below Trump’s heavy thumb, “notably the refusal by Senate Republicans to bow to Mr. Trump’s demand to intestine the filibuster in the course of the shutdown battle, and resistance in some states to his intense push to redraw Home district maps to cement the G.O.P.’s maintain and forestall a Democratic takeover that will imperil the president.”
Fashionable
“swipe left under to view extra authors”Swipe →
Sadly, the probably reply is that Trump will regain his maintain on the GOP, and by extension on Congress. The imperial presidency, as students reminiscent of Schlessinger and Schickler have documented, lengthy predates Trump. The identical is true of the nationalized polarization Trump has exploited.
It’ll take various courageous anti-Trump votes in Congress to resolve the deep constitutional disaster america is mired in. The very best hope is that the Democrats regain management of the Home of Representatives and the Senate within the 2026 midterms. In the event that they accomplish that, they’ve to start out fascinated about not simply checking Trump but additionally restoring the long-eroded powers of Congress and the courts. This can be a challenge that can take a few years, and require the Democrats to first take again the presidency after which rebalance the courts, notably the Supreme Court docket. The doctrine of the “unitary govt” in addition to the long-encrusted emergency powers of the presidency to wage conflict with out congressional approval will should be overturned. This challenge gained’t be simple, however it’s the solely method to guarantee that there will likely be no extra would-be dictators within the White Home.
Extra from The Nation
On this week’s Elie v. U.S., The Nation’s justice correspondent digs into a number of the failures of the fourth property—together with a brand new gerrymandering case, Larry Summers, and extra.
ICE brokers proceed to terrorize communities throughout america by relentless harassment and extreme power.
Mamdani’s election represents a profound and seismic improvement within the nation’s political panorama—one set in movement by Jackson over 40 years in the past.
