Ed. Notice: A weekly roundup of only a few gadgets from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Net’s first weblog dedicated to appellate litigation. Take a look at these tales and extra at How Interesting.
“James Ho Understands What Trump Desires In a Supreme Court docket Justice; Getting on this White Home’s Supreme Court docket shortlist is a matter of displaying that you can be loyal to the president above all else”: Jay Willis has this essay on-line at Balls and Strikes.
“Ed Martin’s failed bid for U.S. legal professional revealed the boundaries of Trump’s energy; The unsuccessful nomination revealed a shifting relationship between the president and GOP senators — and Trump’s willingness to stroll away from a protracted battle”: Martine Powers and Spencer S. Hsu of The Washington Submit have this report.
“Supreme Court docket Lets Trump, for Now, Take away Company Leaders; An appeals courtroom beforehand dominated {that a} key 1935 precedent, lengthy within the cross hairs of the conservative authorized motion, meant the officers might maintain their jobs”: Adam Liptak and Abbie VanSickle of The New York Instances have this report.
“Deadlocked Supreme Court docket Rejects Bid for Spiritual Constitution Faculty in Oklahoma; In a 4-to-4 resolution, the courtroom upheld a ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court docket that blocked the college”: Abbie VanSickle and Sarah Mervosh of The New York Instances have this report.
“Trump 2.0 and the Supreme Court docket Reform Debate; Does the left’s flip to the courts in response to the Second Trump Administration’s excesses present advocates of structural reform of the Supreme Court docket have been improper?” Dan Epps has this post on the “Divided Argument” Substack web site.
“SCOTUS Is About to Endure Patrons Regret, Once more: They determined to deal with the very messy query of nationwide injunctions as a substitute of answering the simple, clearly unconstitutional concern.” You may entry the brand new episode of Slate’s “Amicus” podcast via this link
