“The tide is popping,” says Bernie Sanders. “The American folks don’t wish to spend billions to starve youngsters in Gaza.”
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT makes his technique to a vote on the US Capitol on July 17, 2025.
(Francis Chung / Politico through AP Photos)
In the summertime of 2024, Democratic Celebration leaders refused to let even a single Palestinian American speaker handle their presidential conference about Israel’s horrific assault on Gaza. However nearly precisely a 12 months later, a stable majority of Democratic members of the US Senate has voted to dam arms shipments to Israel in response to an “all-out, unlawful, immoral and horrific warfare of annihilation in opposition to the Palestinian folks” that Senator Bernie Sanders told the chamber is being waged by the federal government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Sanders has tried to dam arms shipments earlier than. However prior to now, he’s gotten solely a handful of his colleagues to hitch his effort. This week, the Vermont impartial had the help of 26 different members of the Senate Democratic Caucus. They didn’t win their battle to forestall a Republican-controlled Senate from authorizing one other $675 million in weapons sales to Israel. However they did transfer the Democratic Celebration a bit additional towards the best facet of historical past, confirming that the relentless campaigning from college students on campuses throughout the nation, in addition to activism by teams similar to Jewish Voice for Peace, the Arab American Institute, the If Not Now Motion, the American Mates Service Committee, the Fellowship of Reconciliation and so many others, is having an affect.
Present Subject
“The tide is popping,” said Sanders, after the vote on Wednesday. “The American folks don’t wish to spend billions to starve youngsters in Gaza.”
In actual fact, the American folks have been opposed for a very long time to the Israeli assault on Gaza, which Amnesty International, Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders), the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel have all recognized as genocidal. Whereas People are nicely conscious of the main points of the October 7, 2023, assault by Hamas, they’ve additionally lengthy since acknowledged that Israel’s ensuing destruction of Gaza—which has left more than 60,000 Palestinians, most of them girls and kids, useless, and is now resulting in mass hunger—is indefensible.
Within the newest Gallup ballot, greater than 60 percent of Americans now disapprove of the Netanyahu authorities’s ongoing assault on Gaza, whereas solely 30 p.c are supportive—the bottom degree of pro-Israel sentiment since Gallup started asking in regards to the subject. Extra importantly, there may be an consciousness that the Trump administration’s help for Netanyahu has made this nation complicit in insurance policies and actions which have left Gazans with out the meals they should survive.
“[It] is totally a violation of worldwide legislation to ban meals from entering into ravenous folks, and the US is complicit on this,” says Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD). “I imply, the US is now spending $30 million to fund this non-public group supported by non-public mercenary contractors, as an alternative of permitting the worldwide assist, humanitarian organizations to supply meals into Gaza. It’s completely sickening that the US authorities is complicit in what’s occurring.”
Widespread
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
Trump and his administration have been and proceed to be morally, virtually, and politically within the incorrect. The query is whether or not Democrats, who’re presupposed to be the opposition celebration, will likely be in the best. They weren’t in 2024, on the conference or throughout the ensuing presidential marketing campaign, and that value them politically.
Sanders has been a longtime, but usually lonely, advocate, for strikes to dam army assist to Israel. He sees progress in the truth that 27 senators have rejected complicity—usually in blunt phrases, as when Vermont Democratic Senator Peter Welch said Wednesday, “The mass hunger in Gaza is attributable to weapons offered by America and paid for by US taxpayers,” and when Oregon Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley declared, “Not one other greenback. Not one other bomb.”
The Senate Democratic Caucus members who joined Sanders, Van Hollen, Welch, and Merkley in voting to cease the arms shipments included Maine impartial Angus King, who said, “I had simply had it. I stored anticipating that Israel would get up and understand what an terrible factor they had been perpetuating, and that absolutely they’d not less than open up humanitarian assist. They simply continued to not do it, and I simply reached the purpose the place sufficient was sufficient.”
Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed, the rating Democrat on the Senate Armed Providers Committee, additionally supported the Sanders decision, as did New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the rating member of the Senate Overseas Relations Committee. However Senate minority chief Chuck Schumer (D-Y) continued to again the arms shipments, as did 18 different Democrats and all of the Republicans who participated within the vote.
(Right here’s a link to a full breakdown of the 27–70 vote. And right here is a link to a 24–73 vote on a second decision by Sanders, which might have blocked the sale of totally automated assault rifles to the Israeli army. )
So there’s progress to report. However within the face of a world outcry over hunger in Gaza, it’s not sufficient, on the Democratic facet—or within the full Senate.
“Whereas a majority of Democrats voting to dam army assist to Israel is actual progress, it’s nonetheless shameful {that a} majority of the Senate voted in opposition to,” explains veteran overseas coverage observer and advocate Matt Duss. “If the physique precisely represented People’ views on Gaza the resolutions ought to’ve handed simply.”
Extra from The Nation
Donald Trump mentioned this week {that a} identified Epstein sufferer was one of many folks “stolen” from Mar-a-Lago by the convicted intercourse offender. Might Trump have identified what would occur to h…
The rule of legislation presupposes that there are guidelines that present a constant, repeatable, and knowable set of outcomes. That’s now not the case.
With Trump’s recognition in freefall, 2026 needs to be a gimme for the opposition. However there are indicators that the Dems might sleepwalk into catastrophe.
Trump’s weird declare that he fell out with the indicted little one intercourse trafficker as a result of Epstein “stole” staff from Mar-a-Lago solely raises extra lurid questions.
