As Republican stress on schooling mounts, the battle over the scholarship reveals a broader effort to show public service right into a check of political loyalty.
Harry S. Truman appears over a marketing campaign poster urging individuals to register to vote.
(Wikimedia Commons)
“Shouldn’t the administration intervene when Jewish college students are unsafe on campus?” Then got here the follow-up: “What if it had been Black college students being lynched on campus—ought to the administration intervene then?”
These had been questions I used to be requested throughout my interview for the Harry S. Truman Scholarship, a nationwide award for school juniors dedicated to careers in public service. Established by Congress in 1975, the taxpayer-funded scholarship was designed to honor President Truman’s perception that democracy requires principled, well-prepared leaders. Annually, round one pupil per state is chosen to obtain funding for graduate college and help in pursuing work in authorities or the nonprofit sector. Candidates should be nominated by their colleges, submit a collection of essays, and, if chosen as a finalist, sit for a 20-minute interview of their dwelling state—a rapid-fire session meant to check their skill to assume on their ft.
However as a substitute of diving into coverage, my interview veered sharply towards politics. I used to be requested in regards to the Trump administration’s focusing on of establishments—together with my school campus, Columbia College. I later realized I wasn’t alone. Different finalists, notably from elite colleges with seen pupil protests, had been equally questioned on their views on Israel and Palestine, a subject far faraway from what they’d written of their purposes.
In fact, scholarship panels ought to ask powerful questions. However when candidates are singled out due to their campus affiliations or ethical convictions, interviews threat turning into political litmus exams somewhat than evaluations of character and imaginative and prescient—from increasing healthcare entry to defending voting rights—that outline their pursuit of public service. I don’t imagine I used to be denied choice for my views, however when service is overshadowed by ideological scrutiny, the method itself turns into weaponized for a partisan agenda.
In Might 2024, Consultant Virginia Foxx, chair of the Home Schooling and the Workforce Committee, joined different Republican congressional leaders in accusing the Truman Basis of political bias. In a letter to the Foundation, the lawmakers demanded an evidence for what they cited as a disproportionate “10:1 ratio” between progressive and conservative Truman students. The message was clear: Deliver this system consistent with their definition of equity—or threat its future.
“Nonpartisan public service” has lengthy been held up as the best that our authorities staff ought to rise above politics to serve the widespread good. However when the info themselves are politicized, does it grow to be partisan to defend voting rights as one celebration seeks to overturn a presidential election—or to advocate for environmental rules when the very existence of local weather change is denied?
Present Problem
The reality is, public service has by no means been apolitical. Each coverage resolution displays a set of values. These are the values on the root of our social contract; we grant energy to the federal government, and in return, it serves us. However when one celebration abandons the core rules of our democracy—the pursuit of fact, free speech, the rule of legislation—the divide is not left versus proper. It’s whether or not you imagine within the bedrock beliefs that maintain our democracy.
Mounting criticism from Republican lawmakers has turned the nonpartisan scholarship right into a political battleground. This spring, Speaker of the Home Mike Johnson appointed Consultant Elise Stefanik—whose viral listening to on campus protests final yr led to the resignation of three Ivy League presidents—to the Truman Basis’s Board of Trustees. The board is composed of 13 members, together with eight presidential appointees and 4 members of Congress from each events.
For the primary time in current reminiscence, when the 2025 Truman Students had been introduced in April, their bios had been absent from the Basis’s web site—presumably out of concern of political backlash. However quickly after, Consultant Stefanik publicly demanded a evaluate of “troubling and well-documented” left-wing bias on the Basis, citing dozens of previous winners “explicitly dedicated to left-wing causes” together with local weather change, LGBTQ+ points, and immigrant rights. Within the letter to the Truman Board of Trustees, she additionally referred to as for a scholar’s award to be rescinded—labeling the coed “Professional-Hamas” based mostly solely on their management in a campus group advocating for Palestinian human rights.
Like universities and personal legislation companies focused by funding cuts and government orders, the Truman Basis faces a wave of existential threats from each outdoors and inside as figures like Stefanik acquire affect over its governing board. They declare to be correcting liberal bias, however the true objective is to redefine public service itself, to construct a state the place working in authorities requires full allegiance to the ruling celebration—or instant removing.
Throughout the federal authorities, President Trump is already redefining “advantage” as loyalty to his administration and its insurance policies. Federal job candidates should now write about their favourite government order. Fulbright Program candidates are rejected for mentioning the phrase “local weather change,” and final month, all the 12-member board resigned, citing White Home interference.
This isn’t only a battle over which college students obtain prestigious alternatives. It’s a battle over whom our authorities serves—and the way we outline service itself. When federal fellowships grow to be political prizes, we return to the spoils system of the nineteenth century. A authorities the place loyalty is rewarded, and experience is discarded. It’s a path straight to authoritarianism, and a betrayal of the values on the coronary heart of those taxpayer-funded packages and of our democracy.
In contrast to personal establishments like Harvard and legislation companies which have pushed again, the Truman Basis operates underneath congressional oversight. However understanding this playbook solely raises the stakes—and makes institutional braveness extra pressing. For younger individuals hoping to pursue a profession in public service, the query is evident: Will now we have the liberty to serve all Individuals, or will loyalty to the ruling celebration grow to be the value of entry? When loyalty turns into the price of public service, we betray a core American worth: that our authorities should work for the individuals, not for anyone individual or celebration. If we fail to withstand now, we gained’t simply lose a era of public servants however the very beliefs they had been referred to as to serve.
Extra from The Nation
In his weekly publication, Elie Mystal lambastes the Republicans’ shameful priorities—and their lethal penalties.
Right here we’re, as soon as once more studying that the restraints Individuals might rely on prior to now are quick disappearing.
Mamdani gained a record-setting main victory, and unions, grassroots Democratic teams, and savvy elected officers are speeding to again him. Now it’s the institution’s flip.
