This text was produced for ProPublica’s Native Reporting Community in partnership with the Bangor Daily News. Sign up for Dispatches to get tales like this one as quickly as they’re printed.
When Jasmin Belanger agreed to a plan to pay $750 in again lease, she had no thought how the choice would hang-out her.
It wasn’t till 10 months later, whereas house searching to distance herself from an ex-boyfriend she mentioned had abused her, that she found an eviction on her file. She hadn’t ever been ordered to maneuver out, having paid her again lease on schedule. Nevertheless it turned out that the 2023 deal she made in courtroom together with her landlord to assist her keep away from eviction created a paper file that made it appear like she had been evicted. That black mark stored her from discovering a brand new place to dwell.
Belanger’s landlord was the Bangor public housing authority, which operates flats for low-income residents. The U.S. Division of Housing and City Growth strongly encourages public housing authorities to supply so-called reimbursement agreements to tenants who’ve fallen behind on lease so as to assist them keep of their houses. It recommends that authorities attain these offers earlier than circumstances attain eviction courtroom.
However housing authorities have flexibility as to how you can design and implement such agreements. And the best way these second-chance alternatives are executed in some components of Maine — verbally in eviction courts with little judicial oversight — has come again to hurt even tenants who meet each time period of their offers.
That’s as a result of judges right here don’t pause eviction circumstances even when tenants and housing authorities attain agreements. In reality, these judges typically grant landlords possession of properties on the time that reimbursement offers are made — expediting the method of kicking out tenants who violate the agreements.
Some states have taken steps to forestall this, requiring landlords to return to courtroom to evict tenants who don’t fulfill the phrases of their reimbursement plans. Housing authorities additionally may select to pause or shut eviction circumstances if reimbursement agreements are made in courtroom, however they not often achieve this in Maine, mentioned Erica Veazey, an lawyer with Pine Tree Authorized Help, a authorized support group primarily based in Portland that represents low-income tenants all through the state.
Most housing authorities in Maine, together with Bangor’s, advised the Bangor Day by day Information and ProPublica that they comply with HUD’s steering and attempt to attain agreements with tenants outdoors of courts. However courtroom data present that’s not at all times true in Bangor, the state’s second-largest housing authority. There, 54 tenants had reimbursement agreements made in courtroom, in response to the newsrooms’ examination of eviction filings between 2019 and 2024. All 54 tenants ended up with eviction judgments in courtroom data, together with those that might have repaid their money owed. (If a reimbursement settlement was made outdoors of courtroom, it could not seem in any official file.)
Maine’s courtroom system is among the final within the nation to depend on paper data, making a holistic accounting of such ghost evictions troublesome. However the Bangor circumstances present for the primary time how these reimbursement agreements can backfire for tenants in opposition to the intent of the HUD steering.
Offered with these findings, Mike Myatt, govt director of Bangor’s housing authority, mentioned he didn’t know public housing residents would routinely find yourself with evictions on their data in the event that they entered into reimbursement agreements in courtroom.
“I don’t fairly perceive or understand how these processes could also be modified,” Myatt mentioned, “however we will surely lead an effort or be a part of an effort that may change these guidelines.”
Credit score:
Linda Coan O’Kresik/BDN
HUD, throughout President Donald Trump’s first time period, started urging housing authorities to succeed in reimbursement agreements earlier than taking tenants to eviction courtroom in July 2020 amid the coronavirus pandemic. In January, simply earlier than President Joe Biden left workplace, the company reemphasized that steering as a part of new safeguards for public housing tenants; that doesn’t embody a advice about whether or not evictions ought to be included on tenants’ data as a part of such offers.
“HUD’s intent appears fairly clear: Eviction submitting ought to be a final resort for housing authorities and never primarily a technique to strong-arm tenants into agreeing to no matter phrases you wish to put them underneath,” mentioned Hannah Adams, a senior lawyer on the Nationwide Housing Legislation Venture, a nonprofit authorized advocacy heart for low-income tenants and owners. She practices in Louisiana, the place judges repeatedly log off on reimbursement agreements with out coming into an eviction judgment.
Of the greater than three dozen tenants contacted by the Bangor Day by day Information and ProPublica, solely Belanger agreed to publicly share her expertise concerning the penalties of getting an eviction on her file.
An eviction, even one which by no means really occurred, can hang-out an individual’s monetary file for years, seen to lenders and potential landlords and hurting alternatives to acquire credit score or lease a house, Adams mentioned.
Requested to touch upon a variety of questions, together with the impact of housing authorities deviating from federal steering, HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett issued a press release saying the Trump administration is reviewing all guidelines finalized over the past administration.
“Many artificially raised the price of housing and administration of HUD packages,” Lovett mentioned. “HUD is trying into this particular rule and contemplating obligatory choices to revise or take away this burden.”
The company didn’t reply to follow-up questions on whether or not or how it could revise the steering about reimbursement agreements.
Perils of Court docket-Primarily based Offers
Belanger mentioned she fell behind on her lease in 2023 as a result of she was paying to remain at a resort to dwell away from her ex. She had additionally misplaced revenue as a result of she was now not exhibiting up repeatedly to her cosmetology job as a result of stress.
An eviction discover delivered to her door in Might 2023 prompted her to fulfill with a monetary counselor on the Bangor housing authority. The counselor suggested her to hunt a reimbursement plan so as to stay in her house and keep away from eviction courtroom, Belanger mentioned. However the housing authority initially refused, telling her that she may solely get a reimbursement plan in courtroom, in response to a textual content message from a housing authority consultant to Belanger. The textual content message seems to contradict Myatt’s characterization of his company’s normal follow.
Myatt wouldn’t clarify why Belanger was not allowed to enter into an settlement earlier than courtroom, saying he couldn’t discuss particular person eviction circumstances even with Belanger’s permission.
“Each eviction case is exclusive and has totally different circumstances,” he mentioned. “We go above and past to assist individuals keep of their housing.”
When her courtroom date arrived two months later in July, Belanger mentioned the method moved shortly. The decide referred to as her identify, and she or he was ushered to a convention room off the courthouse hallway the place the housing authority’s lawyer, Joseph Bethony, verbally supplied her a deal: She may stay in her house if she paid her again lease. She mentioned he by no means talked about something about an eviction happening her file. Bethony declined to remark, referring the Bangor Day by day Information and ProPublica to Myatt. There isn’t a steering on what housing authority attorneys are supposed to inform tenants when making reimbursement agreements, Myatt mentioned.
“Our purpose is to maintain households housed and acquire the essential lease we have to pay our bills,” Myatt mentioned. “Our counsel works with everybody to perform that purpose.”
Belanger, who didn’t have an lawyer, mentioned she agreed to the reimbursement plan with out seeing it in writing.
Credit score:
Linda Coan O’Kresik/BDN
She returned to the courtroom, the place a decide requested if she had reached an settlement with the housing authority. She responded sure and the listening to ended, Belanger mentioned. She believed the deal had been easy: Pay what she owed, make the funds on time and the housing authority would let her keep.
The reimbursement agreements are drawn up by attorneys for the housing authority and aren’t sometimes reviewed by judges, in response to Barbara Cardone, a spokesperson for the Maine Judicial Department. Cardone mentioned the courtroom’s authority in eviction circumstances is restricted to figuring out whether or not the owner can take possession of the property.
The housing authority mentioned it doesn’t give tenants the agreements to sign up courtroom. After the listening to, the company sends a letter to the tenant outlining the reimbursement settlement and phrases of the courtroom ruling. Myatt mentioned he doesn’t evaluate the agreements.
The copy of the settlement that Belanger finally acquired was dated seven days after the courtroom listening to and was signed by Bethony however not Belanger, in response to the doc reviewed by the Bangor Day by day Information and ProPublica. The one-page doc mentioned Belanger had agreed that the decide dominated in favor of the housing authority, which might have the facility to right away evict her if she doesn’t pay her lease — and again lease — on time over the following yr.
She wouldn’t perceive the implications till March 2024, whereas making an attempt to maneuver away from her ex, when a potential landlord knowledgeable her she wouldn’t get the house as a result of an eviction judgment had been entered in opposition to her in courtroom. Belanger even had a reference letter from the housing authority saying that she had fulfilled her reimbursement settlement and her earlier struggles paying lease “have been as a result of monies she has needed to spend staying away from her house to be secure,” in response to an e-mail reviewed by the Bangor Day by day Information and ProPublica.
“I had paid off all of my debt,” Belanger mentioned in an interview. “I’d have fought this if I had identified this was a consequence.”
Myatt, head of the Bangor housing authority, mentioned he trains his workers to make use of court-based agreements as a final resort. He mentioned tenants shouldn’t be punished with eviction data in the event that they’ve fulfilled their agreements.
“If the obligations are met,” he mentioned, “the eviction ought to be lifted.” There may be presently no technique to expunge an eviction file in Maine.

Credit score:
Linda Coan O’Kresik/BDN
In contrast to in Maine, different locations throughout the nation have arrange extra guardrails round reimbursement agreements and evictions. Massachusetts requires all reimbursement agreements made in courtroom to be in writing and authorised by judicial officers. As well as, landlords can’t routinely evict tenants who don’t abide by their agreements; they need to return to courtroom to show tenants didn’t uphold their aspect of the offers earlier than acquiring enforceable eviction orders.
In SeaTac, a Seattle suburb, local ordinances require eviction proceedings to cease in courtroom if a tenant and landlord comply with a reimbursement settlement, so tenants don’t wind up with evictions on their data. In Portland, Oregon, the general public housing authority permits residents to signal reimbursement agreements at any level earlier than eviction hearings.
Nicole Summers, an affiliate professor at Georgetown Legislation who has extensively studied eviction settlements, refers to reimbursement agreements as “civil probation.” That’s as a result of these agreements typically embody guidelines and circumstances governing tenants’ habits nicely past paying off again lease.
In Maine, Veazey mentioned that underneath some agreements, violating public housing guidelines by failing to mow your garden or smoking too near the constructing can result in a tenant’s compelled removing with out having to return to courtroom for an eviction order.
In Presque Isle, the housing authority gave a public housing resident 48 hours to pack up and depart after she missed a lease cost. The girl, featured in a story by the Bangor Daily News and ProPublica in December, was homeless for 3 years after violating the reimbursement plan she had made in courtroom. When there is no such thing as a reimbursement settlement in place, landlords usually should present tenants 30 days’ discover for many lease violations earlier than submitting eviction circumstances in courtroom.
Belanger’s settlement in Bangor featured an analogous set off for eviction. She wasn’t simply required to pay what she owed, she additionally needed to make future lease funds on time for 12 months.
Within the two years since Belanger agreed to the reimbursement deal in courtroom, she mentioned she has felt trapped.
Regardless of a constructive reference from the Bangor housing authority’s director of property administration, landlord after landlord rejected her rental utility due to the eviction. It took the only mom of a toddler 9 months to get into one other house far-off from her ex, who was out on bail after being arrested for allegedly beating and threatening to kill her. (He was later discovered not responsible after a trial.)
Belanger mentioned she’s afraid to maneuver once more as a result of the paper eviction hasn’t gone away.
“I’m most likely nonetheless going to have this problem coming together with me wherever I am going.”
This story was supported partly by a grant from the Fund for Investigative Journalism.
Mariam Elba of ProPublica and Christina Wallace contributed analysis.
