Fifty years in the past, Katharine Graham defended The Washington Submit towards presidential threats. Her granddaughter now fears its soul is being bought.
Fifty-four years in the past, in 1971, my grandmother Katharine Graham, writer of The Washington Submit, risked the whole lot to face as much as a corrupt president. That president sought to destroy her newspaper’s autonomy. At the moment, confronted with one other such president, Jeff Bezos, the paper’s new proprietor, is tearing down the very newspaper she defended.
My grandmother was the lady who staved off threats from President Richard Nixon, defied her attorneys and her board, and stated sure to publishing the Pentagon Papers, which revealed that the federal government was mendacity to the general public in regards to the Vietnam Battle. She was the lady who printed leaks about Nixon’s involvement in Watergate. The girl who discovered her voice within the very act of utilizing it. Fairly often she was, as the brand new documentary Becoming Katharine Graham makes clear, the one girl within the room—nonetheless, she didn’t flinch.
A couple of months in the past, I flew to Washington, DC, to convey one in all my sons to satisfy his nice grandmother, on display screen, within the documentary by filmmakers George, Peter, and Teddy Kunhardt.
Kay, as her associates known as her, died in 2001 earlier than my youngsters have been born. Abruptly voting age, I needed to make sure my son understood the burden of this new accountability and what our nation dangers shedding if we lose our First Modification rights.
The documentary cracked one thing open in me. For years, I’ve hidden the truth that I had a well-known grandmother. Kay wasn’t the grandmother I longed for—not just like the cookie-baking grandmothers on TV. Visits to her mansion have been daunting. There have been grand events, battalions of servants and political banter—however little heat. Regardless of efforts, she may very well be intimidating and judgmental.
I’d grown up with the film All of the President’s Males, which gave all of the credit score to the lads (famed reporters Woodward and Bernstein), erasing Kay’s function fully. The film The Submit reinserted her in historical past—however provided a Disney-esque model. This movie makes her three-dimensional. I noticed her wounds. I noticed her worry. I noticed her braveness.
Present Situation
When editor Ben Bradlee introduced her the Pentagon Papers, Kay had each purpose to say no. She’d been advised by her overpowering mom that her voice was irrelevant. Her attorneys warned her. Her board cautioned her. Nixon’s henchmen threatened to tug her TV broadcasting licenses. As a substitute, as she wrote in her memoir, she “took a giant gulp and stated, ‘Go forward.… Let’s go. Let’s publish!’”
She selected the reality. She empowered her journalists. This helped finish a conflict. It modified historical past.
At the moment, I’m popping out of the shadows as a result of The Washington Submit is below menace once more, this time from Bezos.
I don’t communicate for my household; my opinions are mine alone. I’ve by no means had the distinction to be a part of the newsroom or the corporate: I selected to forge a distinct path.
In 2013, my household made the gut-wrenching resolution to promote the Submit to Bezos, the Amazon founder. The paper was shedding income as a result of advertisers have been transferring on-line. My uncle Don Graham and my sister Katharine Weymouth, each former publishers, believed Bezos had the technological and monetary capability to usher the newspaper into the digital age. Bezos promised, “The values of the Submit don’t want altering…. We’ll proceed to comply with the reality wherever it leads.”
For the primary Trump time period, Bezos honored that promise. He even added the phrase “Democracy Dies in Darkness” to the masthead. My household trusted him.
Now, within the face of a extra tyrannical Trump, Bezos has retreated. He’s muzzled his editorial web page. Distinctive writers, editors, cartoonists have fled. Eight days earlier than the election, the Submit canceled a scheduled endorsement of Kamala Harris—breaking with many years of precedent. 4 hundred Submit journalists signed a protest letter. Two hundred and fifty thousand readers canceled their subscriptions.
On the identical day the Submit spiked its endorsement, executives from Bezos’ aerospace firm, Blue Origin, met with Trump. Coincidence?
On April 4, Blue Origin was awarded a government contract for $2.4 billion to launch the Pentagon’s satellites into area. Bezos additional broke journalistic ethics by donating $1 million to Trump’s inauguration and shopping for the rights to Melania Trump’s docuseries for $40 million.
The Submit’s Code of Ethics requires its journalists “to keep away from conflicts of curiosity.… We pay our personal means. We settle for no presents.… We should be cautious of entanglement with these whose positions render them more likely to be topics of journalistic curiosity.”
Cartoonist Anne Telnaes known as him out in a cartoon depicting Bezos, alongside different tech billionaires, kneeling to Trump—providing cash luggage. Her cartoon was killed. She stop. She went on to win a second Pulitzer Prize, in recognition of “piercing commentary on highly effective folks and establishments.”
The unraveling continued in March, when Bezos introduced on X that Opinion web page writers should embrace the pillars of “private liberties and free markets”—opposing viewpoints weren’t welcome. Editor David Shipley and extra journalists stop. Seventy-five thousand more subscribers canceled. How, I ask, does silencing the voices of your writers assist “private liberties”?
Ruth Marcus, an award-winning 40-year-veteran journalist resigned, writing, “At a second when the Submit ought to have been stepping ahead to sound the clarion name in regards to the a number of risks that Donald Trump poses to the nation and the world, it has chosen to step again.”
Bezos caved again, in April, this time at Amazon, in response to Trump’s fury over Amazon’s plan to show the impression of tariff will increase on costs. Trump phoned Bezos. The tariff reveal was scrapped. Trump gloated, “He solved the issue in a short time.”
In an eloquent column, previous to resigning, Eugene Robinson wrote of my grandmother, “She bowed to no president. I bow to her.”
I grieve for these writers, who should select between feeding their households and honoring their integrity. I bow to them.
Now Bezos has chosen a brand new Opinion editor, Adam O’Neal, who cheerily introduced himself on X. He echoed his new boss’s orders, stating Opinion-page writers should be “stalwart advocates of free markets and private liberties.” Bizarrely, he added that each one future opinion articles shall be “unapologetically patriotic.”
Actual American patriotism doesn’t power journalists to ship authorities propaganda. My grandmother was an actual patriot; she protected the rights of her journalists to ship the information and communicate their minds—with out worry of censorship.
In style
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
O’Neal additionally recommended that they’ll incorporate information from “different retailers” and “even nonprofessional writers.” Is that this the dying of fact-based journalism? Will there be cat movies too?
For Bezos, the Submit may be simply one other plaything; for my household, it was a civic belief. My great-grandfather Eugene Meyer purchased The Washington Submit at a chapter sale in 1933. My grandfather Phil Graham expanded it, till his tragic dying. Kay took over when nobody believed she was succesful; she made it a paper value believing in.
Nobody doubts that it’s onerous to face as much as Trump. His threats, and the violence he stokes, are terrifying—hanging worry into the hearts of immigrants, residents, judges, and our personal lawmakers.
Kay by no means spoke about her struggles. But, within the documentary, her voice broke as she recalled my grandfather Phil’s battle with bipolar sickness, his suicide. I understood then that beneath her steely veneer had lived a terrified girl, thrust into working an organization, whereas elevating 4 youngsters, who had simply misplaced their father. She overcame crippling self-doubt, sexism, and a bullying president. She had no remedy, no coaching—one million causes to cave.
Kay as soon as described herself as a “doormat housewife.” But she turned probably the most highly effective writer in America. Regardless of nice wealth and energy, she and my household taught me that with privilege comes an obligation: to deal with others with dignity and to make this world a greater place.
As I sat beside my son, within the darkened theater, I forgave her private limitations. I grasped how fierce she’d been. That bravery is a legacy I’m proud to move on.
So, that is me, talking up. Like my grandmother, I dread confrontation. “I actually hate fights,” she as soon as stated. “However when cornered, then I can battle.”
We’re all cornered now. I too have thought-about canceling my Submit subscription, however I haven’t but. I see the journalists who proceed to show hard-hitting information in regards to the inhumane, unconstitutional actions of this administration.
If the free press might be manipulated by politicians, if fact is seen as optionally available, if The Washington Submit goes darkish below Bezos, then we lose greater than a legend. We lose the very factor that makes America a democracy.
Bezos had a alternative. He might have reversed course. Honored the promise he made to guard this American establishment. My grandmother confronted down an immoral president. Bezos has chosen to go down as the person who destroyed The Washington Submit—and dismantled its soul.
Daily, The Nation exposes the administration’s unchecked and reckless abuses of energy by way of clear-eyed, uncompromising impartial journalism—the type of journalism that holds the highly effective to account and helps construct alternate options to the world we reside in now.
We’ve got simply the correct folks to confront this second. Talking on Democracy Now!, Nation DC Bureau chief Chris Lehmann translated the complicated phrases of the funds invoice into the plain fact, describing it as “the only largest upward redistribution of wealth effectuated by any piece of laws in our historical past.” Within the pages of the June print situation and on The Nation Podcast, Jacob Silverman dove deep into how crypto has captured American marketing campaign finance, revealing that it was the highest donor within the 2024 elections as an business and received almost each race it supported.
That is all along with The Nation’s distinctive protection of issues of conflict and peace, the courts, reproductive justice, local weather, immigration, healthcare, and way more.
Our 160-year historical past of sounding the alarm on presidential overreach and the persecution of dissent has ready us for this second. 2025 marks a brand new chapter on this historical past, and we’d like you to be a part of it.
We’re aiming to lift $20,000 throughout our June Fundraising Marketing campaign to fund our change-making reporting and evaluation. Stand for daring, impartial journalism and donate to assist The Nation immediately.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Writer, The Nation
Extra from The Nation
The Hole Half is just not merely a memoir of private restoration or an account of Palestinian political historical past. It’s an exploration of fragmentation.
With a brand new GOP majority, the incoming FCC boss goals to punish criticism, reward obedience—and screw the general public.
A brand new Hulu-produced collection by the podcast celebrity paperwork years of sexual harassment and institutional cover-up inside Boston College’s athletics division.
Deporting folks to international locations the place they may be tortured or killed? All good, in accordance with the six GOP justices.
In Eugene, Oregon, CAHOOTS, a decades-old crisis-response program, might disappear, however the packages it impressed have unfold throughout the USA, together with to close by Portland.
A brand new documentary in regards to the 1975 fiscal disaster, Drop Lifeless Metropolis, is entertaining to look at however dangerously deceptive as historical past—or politics.
