Testimony Wednesday within the sex-trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs was marked by a shock movement for a mistrial from Combs’ protection staff. The play, prompted by a reference to destroyed proof in an arson investigation, was rapidly turned again by the decide, who has saved a good grip on the headline-grabbing trial.
Choose Arun Subramanian rejected the protection request for a mistrial after having the jury faraway from the courtroom within the wake of testimony associated to the alleged firebombing of the Porsche owned by Combs’ rival, rapper Child Cudi, whose authorized title is Scott Mescudi.
An arson investigator advised jurors that fingerprint proof obtained after an earlier break-in was inexplicably destroyed after it was turned over to the Los Angeles Police Division. In response, protection attorneys alleged that prosecutors had been trying to indicate Combs interfered with the investigation into the incident — a suggestion protection legal professionals stated was out of bounds.
Sean “Diddy” Combs watches as his protection lawyer Brian Metal cross examines Los Angeles Police Division (LAPD) Officer Christopher Ignacio at Combs’ intercourse trafficking trial in New York Metropolis, Could 28, 2025 on this courtroom sketch.
Jane Rosenberg/Reuters
Subramanian disbursed with the request, partly, as a result of the witness by no means answered a query posed by prosecutors about whether or not it will be uncommon for fingerprint proof to have been destroyed by LAPD staffers.
The mistrial movement marked the primary time Combs’ attorneys pushed to short-circuit the trial, now in its third week of testimony, and threatens to land Combs behind bars for all times if he’s convicted. Prosecutors allege that Combs used his cash and energy to guide a sprawling prison enterprise that enabled him to coerce girls into intercourse.

Sean “Diddy” Combs’ protection lawyer Alexandra Shapiro requests a mistrial at Combs’ intercourse trafficking trial in New York Metropolis, Could 28, 2025 on this courtroom sketch.
Jane Rosenberg/Reuters
Combs has pleaded not responsible. His legal professionals, confronted with testimony detailing a non-public life marked by violence, sexual escapades and illicit drug use, have argued that Combs is perhaps responsible of different crimes however not the costs included within the federal case in opposition to him.
The fifteenth day of the trial concluded with testimony from a detailed buddy of Combs’ former lover and the prosecution’s star witness, Cassie Ventura. The buddy, movie star stylist Deonte Nash, testified to seeing Ventura bodily and verbally abused by Combs. He advised the jury Ventura, a singer who hoped Combs would make her a star, advised him that she didn’t wish to take part in Combs’ intercourse orgies, known as “freak-offs.”
Ventura’s disturbing and sometimes emotional testimony was the centerpiece of the trial’s begin. Attorneys had been rushed to complete Ventura’s look as a result of she was on the verge of delivering her third youngster, and a supply near Ventura stated Wednesday afternoon that Ventura has, the truth is, given birth .
Protection attorneys unsuccessfully request a mistrial
Protection attorneys made their request for a mistrial after LA Fireplace Division arson investigator Lance Jimenez was questioned concerning the fingerprint proof recovered whereas investigating the scene of Child Cudi’s torched Porsche 911.
Child Cudi testified final week that he suspected Combs was behind the fireplace, although the rap mogul has lengthy denied being concerned.
Jimenez advised jurors that he responded to the incident on Jan. 9, 2012, and rapidly reached the conclusion that the fireplace was brought on by a “makeshift firebomb” often known as a Molotov cocktail.
“Any individual had lit it, minimize the roof and dropped it within the entrance seat,” Jimenez advised the jury. “For my part, it was focused.”
Jimenez stated he took be aware of the slash within the canvas prime of the black Porsche 911 Cabriolet and “burn patterns” on the seat, carpeting and roof. The outline was backed up by images proven to the jury and at the moment are publicly out there.
“There was a bottle on the entrance seat, and there was a fabric handkerchief on the middle console that was burned,” Jimenez stated. “Contained in the bottle, I noticed a liquid that gave an odor I do know to be gasoline.”
Jimenez stated he additionally seen a disposable crimson lighter on the bottom, and walked the jury via images of the harm, together with the soot harm on the motive force’s door, the burns on the inside and the minimize within the canvas roof. The jury additionally noticed an image of the lighter, the 40-ounce Outdated English 800 malt liquor bottle used to make the Molotov cocktail and a burned handkerchief.
Jimenez testified that Child Cudi had his residence swept for fingerprints after the incident. Two prints had been lifted from the glass entrance door, Jimenez advised the jury, however the fingerprint playing cards he turned in to the LAPD proof unit had been destroyed in August 2012. The LAPD declined to remark concerning the investigation and destruction of the fingerprint playing cards.
After prosecutors requested Jimenez if it was “uncommon” for fingerprint proof to be destroyed, protection attorneys instantly moved for a mistrial, accusing the federal government of prosecutorial misconduct.
Combs’ staff accused the federal government of attempting to plant the concept Combs was accountable for the destruction of the fingerprints lifted from Child Cudi’s entrance door.
“It was turning into clearer and clearer that this inference was what the federal government was doing this for,” Shapiro stated. “There isn’t any approach to unring this bell.”
Subramanian denied the mistrial however gave the jury a warning.
“Earlier than the break, you heard some testimony about fingerprint playing cards, and I am now instructing you that questions relating to the destruction of the fingerprint playing cards and the solutions are irrelevant to this case and to the defendant and are to not be thought of by you,” Subramanian stated.
Jimenez testified he tried calling a number of individuals at Child Cudi’s suggestion, together with Ventura and Combs’ former assistant Capricorn Clark. He stated he was unable to succeed in them.
No fees had been filed in reference to the arson, although the case has not been closed. Jimenez stated the standing is “inactive pending something additional.”
Los Angeles police officer recounts aftermath of alleged Porsche firebombing
Prosecutors started the day by calling to the witness stand the Los Angeles police officer who responded to Child Cudi’s residence on Dec. 22, 2011, after he reported a break-in.
LAPD officer Christopher Ignacio stated he went via the house with the rapper and recorded the incident as trespassing for “somebody getting into somebody’s property with out the proprietor’s consent.” When he ran the license plate from a black Cadillac Escalade seen driving from the home, the report from the California Division of Motor Automobiles confirmed the registered proprietor as Dangerous Boy Productions, Inc., Combs’ firm.
Jurors noticed the DMV report linking the automobile to Dangerous Boy Productions, the one piece of proof that ties Combs’ firm to the incident. Tuesday, Combs’ former private assistant, Clark, advised jurors that Combs and a bodyguard kidnapped her at gunpoint from an residence and drove to Child Cudi’s residence. She testified they entered the home. Child Cudi testified that nothing was lacking however he discovered Christmas presents opened on the counter and his canine locked in a rest room.
On cross-examination by Combs’ attorneys, protection legal professionals tried to emphasize that Ignacio’s report didn’t point out a firearm being concerned. Throughout Tuesday’s testimony, protection attorneys equally pressed Clark about her recollection that Combs had a gun on him on the time of the incident – a element that may very well be very important to prosecutors who may argue the alleged kidnapping is related to the racketeering conspiracy part of the case in opposition to Combs.
Ventura’s Buddy: ‘Very often’ noticed Ventura with bruises
Cassie Ventura’s longtime buddy and movie star stylist Deonte Nash testified he “very often” noticed Combs’ girlfriend Ventura with bruises, and he “very often” knew her to spend nights with Combs in resort rooms in opposition to her will.
On Ventura’s twenty ninth birthday, Nash testified that Combs advised Ventura, “[expletive] you. I do all this for you, and you may’t do that one factor for me,” Nash stated. “Cassie stated, ‘He is simply mad that I do not wish to go to the resort and freak off with him.'”
Combs, based on Nash’s testimony, would determine how Ventura would seem, from her clothes to her coiffure. He recalled arriving with Cassie on the 2014 Vainness Truthful Oscars afterparty. “She appeared bomb. Her hair was down,” Nash stated, however he advised the jury Combs came visiting and stated, “I believed I advised you she must put on her hair up.”
Nash testified Combs angrily grabbed him by his jacket and lifted him up. “I simply began asking individuals on the occasion for hairpins,” Nash stated.
Throughout his testimony, Nash recalled quite a few cases of violence and threats of violence by Combs, particularly one incident when he stated Ventura thought of climbing over a resort balcony in Beverly Hills to flee Combs, who had simply arrived. Nash testified that Ventura “was frightened” after he advised her “that Puff was downstairs in search of her.”

Sean “Diddy” Combs watches as prosecutor Maurene Comey questions movie star stylist Deonte Nash, at Combs’ intercourse trafficking trial in New York Metropolis, Could 28, 2025 on this courtroom sketch.
Jane Rosenberg/Reuters
Testifying as a result of he was subpoenaed, Nash recalled Combs telling Ventura “that he would not put her music out, that he would get her dad and mom fired from their jobs, that he would put out intercourse tapes.”
Federal prosecutors have alleged Combs maintained coercive management over Ventura that triggered her to have interaction in freak-offs that she didn’t wish to be a part of.
The movie star stylist stays a buddy of Ventura’s to today, he testified, and stated he helped her choose a marriage gown in addition to talked to her about what she would put on whereas testifying at trial.
Protection portrayed Combs as having the ultimate say over Cassie’s look as a enterprise resolution as a substitute of a component of coercion, as prosecutors alleged.
“It is vital for the one that ran the label that the particular person look good, truthful to say?” protection legal professional Xaviar Donaldson requested.
“Generally, yeah,” Nash agreed.