Judges throughout Tennessee are actually demanding larger accountability from individuals who have been ordered to surrender their weapons, a shift geared toward strengthening protections for home violence victims.
The change is being adopted county by county, after state lawmakers bowed to opposition from the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation over a invoice that will have taken that reform statewide.
The transfer follows reporting by WPLN and ProPublica over the previous two years that discovered Tennessee’s lax gun legal guidelines and enforcement have allowed firearms to stay in harmful arms. The state constantly has one of many highest charges of ladies killed by males, and most of these homicides are dedicated with weapons. The news organizations’ analysis discovered that about 1 in 4 victims of home violence gun homicides had been killed by somebody who was barred from having a firearm.
In Tennessee, when somebody is convicted of a home violence cost or is topic to an order of safety, they aren’t allowed to own a gun. An individual ordered to relinquish their firearm can flip it over to a 3rd celebration, like a buddy or relative, for safekeeping. However the state doesn’t require them to reveal whose arms the weapon leads to. Advocates say that makes it exhausting to make sure that the weapons got up — and that they got to somebody who’s legally allowed to carry on to them.
As a part of its investigation, WPLN and ProPublica reported on an East Tennessee county that had transformed its justice system for domestic violence victims. Scott County’s reforms embrace a requirement that when a courtroom is stripping home violence abusers of their weapons, they need to inform the courtroom in a written affidavit who’s going to take custody of their weapons. The county additionally asks for the tackle of that individual, who’s requested to signal an affidavit saying they’re in receipt of the weapons. None of those further measures of accountability, nevertheless, are required on the state’s normal gun-dispossession kind.
“The [state’s] kind is absolutely incomplete,” mentioned Becky Bullard with Nashville’s Workplace of Household Security. “We will’t have somebody dispossess of their firearm lawfully if we don’t know who they’re giving the gun to.”
At the least 9 counties, together with Tennessee’s two largest, Davidson and Shelby, have amended the state’s gun dispossession affidavit to require details about who will probably be taking possession of the weapon. Different counties are additionally contemplating the change, advocates say.
“After I heard about what Scott County was doing, I used to be shocked,” mentioned Shelby County Decide Greg Gilbert, who adjusted that courtroom’s kind when he discovered that courts had been ready to do this themselves. “It does make it a bit of extra possible that folks will take this critically.”
Final 12 months, two Republican lawmakers launched laws that will have made Scott County’s kind the default for the remainder of the state, however the bill was pushed to 2026 after opposition from the Tennessee Firearms Association and the NRA. Neither affiliation responded to requests for remark on the time. One of many lawmakers who launched the invoice, Sen. Becky Massey, a Knox County Republican, mentioned she would transfer ahead with the invoice once more if her Home counterpart, Rep. Kelly Keisling, did. However Keisling, a Republican whose district consists of Scott County, mentioned he’s “unsure as to the way forward for this explicit piece of laws.”
This month, advocates for victims of home violence additionally pushed for a state council on home violence to advocate adoption of the amended kind. That effort failed after a procedural mishap; the group plans to revisit the subject at its subsequent assembly in March.
“We actually don’t have a minute to lose. This can be a battle that we now have been preventing round a kind for years,” mentioned Bullard, who has advocated for this reform since a deadly shooting in 2018 at a Waffle House the place the person traveled with a gun that he was ordered to surrender. “And it may have an effect on somebody within the subsequent minute.”
