The remaking of Trump’s Washington, DC
The ballroom and his different proposed constructing tasks are many issues, however they aren’t precisely works of structure.
Donald Trump, October 2025.
(Demetrius Freeman / Getty).
The $300 million ballroom that former actual property developer and present president Donald Trump is constructing the place the East Wing of the White Home as soon as stood is many issues. The 90,000-square-foot room is an ideal expression of Trump’s unfailingly plutocratic worldview. It’s a flex of his tragically warped concept of energy, and most of all it’s a handy means for gutless company CEOs to pay tribute: Donors to the ballroom development fund embrace on line casino mogul Miriam Adelson’s Household Basis, Amazon, Apple, Altria Group (previously referred to as Philip Morris)… and people are simply the A’s.
The ballroom is many issues, however it isn’t precisely a piece of structure. Sure, it has an architect, a person named James McCrery, and there are fashions and renderings. Sure, if accomplished, it is going to be a constructing. However when you look previous the conceptual art work that Trump has held aloft for the cameras, it’s only a field. You may consider it because the sort of field you see alongside the freeway, a Greatest Purchase or a Walmart. Definitely, the size is extra like a kind of humongous shops than that of the White Home residence, a much more modest construction the place presidents have been content material to dwell, work, and socialize for hundreds of years. Nonetheless, not like these retail bins, the ballroom has a coffered ceiling, arched home windows, gold chandeliers, and an exterior seemingly marked by at the least two separate units of Corinthian columns. If the friends to Trump’s galas are fortunate, the ballroom may also have a mammoth kitchen and sizable restrooms, though there’s no signal of these within the pictures we’ve seen to date.
However Trump’s ballroom isn’t a ballroom. Slightly, it’s an object lesson, the right exemplar of Trump’s tendency to get issues flawed. The vary of issues he will get flawed each time he opens his mouth offers countless fodder for late-night comics and the denizens of social media, however his most constant (and least humorous) misunderstanding regards what it’s that makes America nice.
The ballroom is a part of this misunderstanding, Trump’s try and claw again the American dream. And when you regard it as a symbolic object, it’s the antithesis of the Statue of Liberty and emblematic not of our highest beliefs, realized or not, however of our basest instincts, a monument to not generosity and alternative however to corruption and graft. It’s a rebuke in bricks and mortar (or possibly simply prefabricated, tilt-up partitions) to the entire notion of “We the Individuals.”
Whereas Washington, DC, has by no means completely lived as much as this democratic imaginative and prescient, its founders gave it their all. Thomas Jefferson, specifically, was obsessed with classical structure, its formal qualities and its symbolism. After the conclusion of the American Revolution, he was appointed “treaty commissioner” to France and spent a lot of his time scouting the continent for relics of the classical previous to supply his new nation with the iconographic language of columns and domes that he thought would evoke the traditional world’s democratic and republican beliefs.
After all, Jefferson—a slave proprietor—didn’t precisely adhere to the beliefs he famously espoused: His personal classically designed residence was constructed by enslaved labor. However he did attempt in Washington, DC, to create a metropolis of republican and democratic grandeur, one during which the buildings conveyed each the stateliness and the openness of standard authorities.
With the French-born architect Pierre Charles L’Enfant, Jefferson labored on a plan for the brand new capital and was instrumental within the creation of a domed constructing for Congress that echoed Rome’s Pantheon. He additionally entered (however didn’t win) the 1792 competitors for the design of the president’s residence and places of work, a White Home that was additionally topped by a dome and would invoke the notion of self-rule.
Trump has inserted this idealistic imaginative and prescient of public structure in numerous texts and government orders, however he appears unable to observe what he sometimes preaches. For him, DC isn’t a metropolis of democracy or standard self-government, however the management room of an empire that bends to the desire of its ruler. Trump, a person who affixed his title to each constructing he’s ever constructed—in addition to each golf course—is a little bit of a slouch compared with historical emperors who most well-liked to call total cities after themselves, like Alexander the Nice and Alexandria or Constantine I and Constantinople. However, for the second, Trump continues to be compelled to rule from a metropolis named for George Washington.
As a New York structure critic within the Nineties, I did a lot of cellphone interviews with Trump during which he would talk about his present tasks and invariably check with a lot of earlier ones: Trump Tower, Trump Worldwide Resort and Tower, Trump Wall Avenue, Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Parc, Trump World Tower, and so forth. I’d marvel at the truth that he may maintain all of them straight.
I can consider just one instance of one thing Trump constructed that was emblematic of something apart from his boundless ego. When he inexplicably erected a miniature Unisphere exterior the newly opened Trump Worldwide Resort and Tower (beforehand the Gulf & Western Constructing) on Columbus Circle, I discovered that the undertaking’s buyers had persuaded him to rent a feng shui grasp, Pun-Yin of Tin Solar Metaphysics Company, to resolve the issue of the “excessive forces” generated by the fixed stream of visitors going across the close by visitors circle. The globe was positioned to “neutralize” these forces, and the rings across the globe, Pun advised me, represented the “unity and concord of the world.”
Which may be the one time, so far as I can keep in mind, that Trump ever constructed something within the curiosity of unity and concord. Typically, his profligate use of shiny supplies has symbolized just one factor: his bottomless urge for food for opulence.
Trump’s Washington, or at the least his White Home, has to date adopted swimsuit. The gold trim with which he has festooned the Oval Workplace makes it appear to be a scene from a czarist theme park. And his newly reworked Lincoln Rest room suggests a really plush mausoleum. Whereas he may invoke the (small-r) republican structure of the founding fathers in government orders denouncing Modernist and Brutalist structure, that doesn’t imply he understands it. In fact, there is just one custom of which Trump is an adherent: the ravenous, self-aggrandizing tradition that’s lengthy characterised a lot of New York Metropolis actual property growth.
Previous to his hurried demolition of the East Wing, Trump’s most notorious destruction job concerned a good-looking 50-year-old Artwork Deco constructing that had been designed by Warren and Wetmore, architects greatest recognized for his or her design of Grand Central Terminal. It housed the beloved however financially troubled division retailer Bonwit Teller. Lengthy a trend chief, introducing designers resembling Christian Dior and Calvin Klein to New York’s carriage commerce, the shop was additionally recognized for its wacky, artist-designed window shows, together with a pair by Salvador Dalí (when he was already well-known) and plenty of by still-unknown artists like Andy Warhol, Jasper Johns, and Robert Rauschenberg. Nonetheless, by the late Seventies, Bonwit Teller had misplaced its luster, and its mother or father firm, Genesco, was having cash-flow issues.
Trump bought the constructing in 1979 for $15 million with the intention of tearing it down; it occupied the spot the place he deliberate to construct—you guessed it—his first eponymous tower. His architect on the time, Der Scutt, reportedly tried to steer Trump that the location on Fifth Avenue known as for one thing extra sober and, properly, conventional. Nonetheless, as Michael Lisicky wrote in a 2020 account in Forbes, “Trump was adamant that he wished his Trump Tower to be a bronze-colored glass skyscraper. Scutt was unable to sway Trump. In 1980, the architect advised New York Journal, ‘If Donald hasn’t constructed it, it’s not any good. And it has to flash to be good.’”
So as to add insult to harm, Trump had promised to provide the Metropolitan Museum of Artwork the constructing’s pair of 15-foot bas-relief sculptures of dancing girls and a big nickel-plated grille that was mounted over the shop’s entrance. But when Trump’s demolition crew arrived, they jackhammered all of it into oblivion.
A Trump “spokesman” who recognized himself as John Baron (a pseudonym typically utilized by Trump) defined to a Day by day Information reporter on the time that the sculptures weren’t value saving and the work wanted to protect them would have set again the development schedule by two weeks. Which is to say that Trump’s respect for conventional structure solely extends to the purpose the place it will get in his means.
Essentially the most alarming facet of Trump’s ballroom, maybe, is that it seems to be one undertaking of many. After all, in the course of the first Trump time period we had been advised he was masterminding an bold nationwide program of infrastructure development. That by no means occurred, and “Infrastructure Week” turned a working joke.
However this time round, he’s not speaking about airports or bridges or something clearly helpful. The truth is, he’s currently taken to defunding important infrastructure tasks (like the brand new rail tunnel connecting New York Metropolis and New Jersey) to punish his perceived enemies. As an alternative, what Trump is thinking about is leaving his imprint on no matter he can, helpful or not. For instance, he’s revived plans floated throughout his first administration for a Nationwide Backyard of American Heroes, a sculpture backyard stocked, Madame Tussaud–fashion, with 250 People, chosen by a White Home process pressure, together with the founding fathers whose concepts he fails to know. He additionally desires to construct a triumphal arch on the entrance to Arlington Nationwide Cemetery, supposedly to commemorate the 250th anniversary our nation’s independence, however presumably extra emblematic of the top of a fairly good two-and-a-half-century run.
The factor that’s most unnerving concerning the arch is that the custom it evokes will not be that of classical republicanism and democracy however slightly of an entire different period of bombastic overstatement. It’s laborious to have a look at renderings of that huge arch—significantly the best way it’s positioned on an axis resulting in the Lincoln Memorial—with out seeing Albert Speer’s Germania, Hitler’s unbuilt plan to remake Berlin with a monumental Nice Corridor linked by a broad freeway to a gargantuan arch.
Individuals who dwell in a selected metropolis typically have a proprietary relationship with its buildings and study the laborious means, when a favourite is razed by its precise landlord, that their feeling of possession is an phantasm. Consider New York Metropolis’s well-known Pennsylvania Station (with a ready room modeled on Rome’s Baths of Caracalla), demolished in 1963, or Hudson’s in Detroit, the tallest division retailer on this planet till it was imploded in 1998.
Well-liked
“swipe left under to view extra authors”Swipe →
In Washington, DC, nonetheless, that sense of possession will not be illusory. A lot of the landmark buildings do, in truth, belong to the general public. The White Home, as an example—or what stays of it—is owned by the American folks. It’s maintained on our behalf by the Nationwide Parks Service. It has by no means been the unique property of any of its occupants, together with Trump. Usually, the development of the ballroom (and the demolition of the East Wing) could be topic to a posh regulatory course of that, in our nation’s capital, routinely entails a large number of companies and commissions. It’s usually troublesome to construct something in DC or to destroy publicly owned buildings.
Oddly, the White Home sits in a loophole. In accordance with the Nationwide Belief for Historic Preservation, it’s “expressly exempt from the Nationwide Historic Preservation Act” and subsequently isn’t protected against demolition. Not coincidentally, the seven-member US Fee of Nice Arts, which must log out on the design of the ballroom, was purged of its current members by the White Home in October. New members haven’t but been introduced (though McCrery, the ballroom architect, was appointed to the fee by Trump throughout his first time period).
In a letter dated October 21, the day after the East Wing’s demolition had begun, Dr. Carol Quillen, the Nationwide Belief’s president and CEO, “respectfully urge[d] the Administration and the Nationwide Park Service to pause demolition till plans for the proposed ballroom undergo the legally required public evaluate processes.” However respectful urging is a kind of nitpicky issues, just like the letter of the legislation, that doesn’t appear to imply rather a lot to our present president. Quillen goes on to level out: “These processes present an important alternative for transparency and broad engagement—values which have guided preservation of the White Home below each administration going again to the general public competitors in 1792 that produced the constructing’s unique design.”
In different phrases, the general public course of, just like the columns and the domes, is a practice. And, like buildings, a course of could be bulldozed. As Robert Moses, one of many mid–twentieth century’s most energetic wielders of the bulldozer and no fan of public course of, defined: “It’s a must to hack your means with a meat ax.” Which is exactly what Trump simply did.
Over the previous 12 months you’ve learn Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky tackle the Trump household’s corruption, set the document straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Wholesome Once more motion, survey the fallout and human price of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court docket’s harmful antidemocratic rulings, and amplify profitable techniques of resistance on the streets and in Congress.
We publish these tales as a result of when members of our communities are being kidnapped, family debt is climbing, and AI knowledge facilities are inflicting water and electrical energy shortages, we’ve got an obligation as journalists to do all we are able to to tell the general public.
In 2026, our intention is to do greater than ever earlier than—however we’d like your help to make that occur.
Via December 31, a beneficiant donor will match all donations as much as $75,000. That signifies that your contribution shall be doubled, greenback for greenback. If we hit the total match, we’ll be beginning 2026 with $150,000 to put money into the tales that impression actual folks’s lives—the sorts of tales that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed retailers aren’t protecting.
Along with your help, our staff will publish main tales that the president and his allies gained’t need you to learn. We’ll cowl the rising military-tech industrial advanced and issues of conflict, peace, and surveillance, in addition to the affordability disaster, starvation, housing, healthcare, the setting, assaults on reproductive rights, and rather more. On the identical time, we’ll think about alternate options to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a greater world, right here and now.
Whereas your present has twice the impression, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation as we speak. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers greatest outfitted to carry this authoritarian administration to account.
I hope you gained’t miss this second—donate to The Nation as we speak.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and writer, The Nation
Extra from The Nation

David Landes argues that cell telephones signify an remoted life whereas Kimberly Hassel blames the loneliness disaster on a society unable to help or shield its youth.

I spent six months with a flip cellphone. I discovered {that a} extra aware technological future would require rather more than simply unplugging.

In 1994, the author Leslie Marmon Silko wrote a chunk for The Nation warning of a daunting new immigration regime.



