Deporting individuals to nations the place they may be tortured or killed? All good, in keeping with the six GOP justices.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) brokers knock on the door of a residence in Chicago on Sunday, January 26, 2025.
(Christopher Dilts / Bloomberg by way of Getty Pictures)
I all the time knew that Donald Trump’s unhinged cruelty towards immigrants would discover assist and luxury among the many Republicans on the Supreme Court docket. However I held out hope that his brazen violations of lower-court orders would possibly give the Republicans pause earlier than greenlighting Trump’s continued terror marketing campaign towards individuals who didn’t occur to be born right here.
On Monday, that small sliver of hope was dashed. The Supreme Court docket issued a ruling from its emergency docket permitting Trump to ship immigrants to third-party nations—even ones the place they may be tortured and killed. The Republican order violates this nation’s constitutional grant of due course of, worldwide human rights legal guidelines, literal treaties to which this nation is a signatory, and primary human decency. In different phrases, it was a bog-standard Republican Supreme Court docket ruling.
The case, Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D, includes Trump’s ongoing apply of deporting individuals to third-party nations the place the immigrants aren’t even from.
The truth that our nation can do that in any respect is sick and disgusting. Think about: You come right here, fleeing violence in your house nation. Your mere presence on this nation is deemed a violation of our (silly and merciless) immigration legal guidelines, so we determine to deport you. However our personal authorities determines that we can’t ship you again to your own home nation, as a result of the violence you had been fleeing was so actual and apparent that there’s an amazing likelihood you’ll be killed if you’re returned.
The rational play could be to carry you right here, in America, the nation whose immigration legal guidelines you allegedly violated, however no, no, no, our authorities decides to ship you to a wholly completely different place.
You’ll be able to properly think about the sorts of nations which are keen to onboard our immigration issues, for a price. They’re locations like El Salvador, which has developed a complete income stream from imprisoning and torturing immigrants, or South Sudan, a rustic wracked by battle and violence.
The federal government is just not speculated to ship individuals to nations the place they may be tortured. That’s not simply because of an ethical crucial or a judicial rule. It’s due to a human rights treaty that this nation has been part of for many years. It’s known as the Convention Against Torture, and it states: “No State occasion could expel or extradite an individual to a State the place there are substantial grounds for believing that he could be at risk of being subjected to torture.”
In different phrases, if a choose determines that the place the federal government is making an attempt to ship somebody would possibly torture that particular person once they get there, then the federal government must ship them some other place.
This shouldn’t be a tough rule to observe! And, certainly, it has been adopted for many years. However Trump and his authorized henchman Solicitor Normal John Sauer discovered a “loophole” within the rule. For any younger attorneys studying: If somebody asks you to discover a “loophole” in a treaty known as the Conference Towards Torture… that’s your sign that you’re working for the unhealthy guys. Give up now or pray that no respectable individuals uncover what you used to do for a dwelling.
The loophole apparently exists for conditions the place a choose has already prevented the federal government from sending an immigrant to a rustic specified by the federal government. In keeping with the Trump administration, as soon as the choose has blocked deportation to any of the nations the federal government introduced up within the preliminary listening to, the federal government is free to ship the immigrant to a rustic the federal government by no means talked about beforehand, with out having to undergo a second listening to to find out if these new nations additionally torture individuals.
So if the federal government says, “We’re going to ship you to Isengard,” and a choose says, “No, they’ll be killed by the white hand of Saruman,” the Trump administration can say, “Superb. However you didn’t say something about Mordor,” and ship them away. This, considerably clearly, flouts the letter and the spirit of the legislation and the Conference Towards Torture, however what reads to you and me as “clearly unlawful” reads to John Roberts and his clique of authorized arsonists as “a enjoyable problem.” Which brings us to DHS v. D.V.D.
The case includes 4 immigrants who had been via deportation hearings and obtained a ruling that they couldn’t be shipped again to their residence nations. After these hearings, Trump determined to ship them to South Sudan—a rustic that was not on the record of potential locations throughout the preliminary deportation proceedings—with out giving them one other listening to to find out if South Sudan was a secure place for them to be (spoiler: It’s not).
A district court docket choose in Massachusetts blocked the deportations (extra on that later), however on Monday, the Supreme Court docket intervened. In an unsigned opinion, the six Republican justices dominated that Trump may resume deportations to nations which may violate the Conference Towards Torture whereas the federal government continues to enchantment the lower-court ruling.
The Republican ruling wasn’t on the “deserves,” which implies the justices didn’t rule on whether or not Trump’s practices violate the legislation. As an alternative, they issued a procedural ruling taking away the ability of the decrease courts to cease Trump’s torturous practices. This has turn out to be the favourite transfer of the Republican justices throughout the Trump administration: elevate injunctions positioned towards Trump by decrease courts and permit him to hold out his unconstitutional insurance policies, whereas promising to rule on the legality of these insurance policies at an unspecified later date. It provides Trump loads of time to do no matter he desires with out the court docket having to formally assist it.
Once more, I all the time anticipated this Supreme Court docket to be in favor of torturing immigrants. Republican justices like torture greater than Jack Bauer. The place I’d hoped for daylight between Trump’s methodology of sending immigrants to be tortured and the Republican judicial methodology of sending immigrants to be tortured was on the problem of which department of presidency units the principles for torturing immigrants. As I discussed, Trump’s deportations had already been blocked by decrease courts, however Trump stored sending individuals away anyway. The plaintiffs on this case, as an illustration, had been despatched to Djibouti pending a ruling on whether or not they might be despatched to South Sudan. Legally, they need to have been capable of keep in America whereas their case was being deliberated. I believed there was an opportunity that the Supreme Court docket would hold the lower-court injunction in place as a rebuke to Trump’s constant makes an attempt to get round court docket orders.
In style
“swipe left under to view extra authors”Swipe →
However I hoped for an excessive amount of from the Republicans. Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlighted the failure of her Republican colleagues to defend the judicial system in her dissent. She wrote: “The Authorities thus brazenly flouted two court docket orders, together with the one from which it now seeks reduction. Even when the orders in query had been mistaken, the Authorities had an obligation to obey them till they had been ‘reversed by orderly and correct proceedings.’”
Sadly, because of the Republican supermajority on the Supreme Court docket, the Trump authorities has no obligation to obey lower-court rulings.
Now, with the injunction lifted, Trump can resume sending immigrants to their ache and struggling, whereas the case makes its approach, over the subsequent few years, to the Supreme Court docket on the common docket. It’s nonetheless doable that, later, at a time of their very own selecting, at the very least two of the Republicans will determine that Trump’s brazen violation of the Conference Towards Torture really does violate the Conference Towards Torture.
However whereas the Supreme Court docket waits to determine it out, numerous numbers of immigrants will probably be despatched to locations like South Sudan, in violation of the Conference Towards Torture and the due strategy of legislation.
That is simply what we do on this nation now. We’re a rogue state, a menace on the worldwide stage, and the form of place that finds “loopholes” in worldwide human rights treaties. We’re the unhealthy guys.
Each day, The Nation exposes the administration’s unchecked and reckless abuses of energy via clear-eyed, uncompromising impartial journalism—the form of journalism that holds the highly effective to account and helps construct alternate options to the world we stay in now.
We now have simply the best individuals to confront this second. Talking on Democracy Now!, Nation DC Bureau chief Chris Lehmann translated the advanced phrases of the funds invoice into the plain fact, describing it as “the one largest upward redistribution of wealth effectuated by any piece of laws in our historical past.” Within the pages of the June print difficulty and on The Nation Podcast, Jacob Silverman dove deep into how crypto has captured American marketing campaign finance, revealing that it was the highest donor within the 2024 elections as an business and gained practically each race it supported.
That is all along with The Nation’s distinctive protection of issues of battle and peace, the courts, reproductive justice, local weather, immigration, healthcare, and rather more.
Our 160-year historical past of sounding the alarm on presidential overreach and the persecution of dissent has ready us for this second. 2025 marks a brand new chapter on this historical past, and we want you to be a part of it.
We’re aiming to lift $20,000 throughout our June Fundraising Marketing campaign to fund our change-making reporting and evaluation. Stand for daring, impartial journalism and donate to assist The Nation at present.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Writer, The Nation
Extra from The Nation

In Eugene, Oregon, CAHOOTS, a decades-old crisis-response program, could disappear, however the packages it impressed have unfold throughout the US, together with to close by Portland.

A brand new documentary concerning the 1975 fiscal disaster, Drop Useless Metropolis, is entertaining to look at however dangerously deceptive as historical past—or politics.

A grant-supported program discovered success transitioning younger individuals related to gangs into greater schooling—till the cash stopped coming.

Former Cincinnati Reds participant and supervisor Pete Rose represents a toxic type of masculinity that needs to be rooted out, not beatified.

Within the streets, in our legislatures, and within the courts, political leaders are calling for legislation and order, ignoring the truth that it’s their officers wreaking havoc.