Progressive Caucus chair Greg Casar warns {that a} transfer to redraw Texas congressional districts will undermine democracy within the Lone Star State and past.
President Trump and his Republican cronies are conscious that their “One Big Beautiful Bill” is polling miserably with an citizens that, by most accounts, actually hates it when the federal government guts Medicaid and anti-hunger applications with a purpose to fund tax cuts for billionaires. The unpopularity of the GOP’s signature legislative effort might spell catastrophe for the social gathering’s efforts to take care of its slender management of the US Home within the 2026 midterms. However Congressional Progressive Caucus chair Greg Casar (D-TX) warns that the president and his GOP allies have developed a contingency plan to keep away from voter accountability subsequent 12 months—and it facilities across the Lone Star state.
Trump has pressured Texas officials to maneuver quickly—as quickly as subsequent week—to redraw congressional district strains to dramatically cut back the variety of Democratic-leaning constituencies within the state. If the president’s scheme succeeds, Democrats might lose as many as 5 of the seats they now maintain in Texas.
Casar spoke to The Nation about what’s at stake for voting rights in Texas—the place, as he notes, GOP gerrymandering is already extreme: “Proper now, it’s 12 Democrats and 35 Republicans, with one emptiness, in a state that [Republican Senator] Ted Cruz couldn’t even get 51 p.c of the vote in in 2018.” Casar warns that if Republicans get away with radically redrawing Texas congressional districts to favor the GOP and shield Trump much more, this mannequin for assaulting voting rights will rapidly transfer to different pink states.
How massive a menace to American democracy and voting rights is Trump’s Texas scheme?
This can be a five-alarm fireplace for voting rights and democracy throughout your complete nation. In my opinion, that is the largest menace to our democracy proper now that no person’s speaking about.
This isn’t nearly anyone election. Texas already has a deeply and illegally racially gerrymandered congressional map. Donald Trump is demanding to place that racially gerrymandered map on steroids.
There’s been appreciable dialogue about whether or not Trump and the Republicans would attempt to discover some approach to mess with the 2026 election cycle. Why is he performing now?
Trump simply bought executed pushing by means of a invoice to kick 15 million People off their healthcare, all to pay for billionaire tax cuts. He is aware of that’s deeply unpopular. He doesn’t wish to be held accountable for that. Nor does he need himself and his household to be held accountable for his or her corrupt and unlawful enterprise dealings.
If he can’t win the election [under existing maps], he needs to rig the foundations of the election by suppressing the vote of hundreds of thousands of Texas voters of coloration and working-class Texans—by radically gerrymandering a map in a means that no person has seen earlier than, after which getting the Supreme Courtroom to rubber-stamp it in the dark to permit for even additional gerrymandering and voter suppression past Texas
What you might be saying is that the redrawing of congressional district maps in Texas might develop into a template for creating all kinds of recent Home seats that can be gerrymandered to favor the Republicans. If the Republicans succeed, they might save GOP management of Congress, even when most voters wish to finish that management.
That’s proper. What they’re speaking about doing in Texas is principally [packing Democratic voters into a handful of districts] or splitting them up illegally into little shards and thereby diluting their voting energy.
Trump needs to take us again to pre-1965 on Medicaid. And, now, he needs to take us to pre-1965 on voting rights. [Ed. note: The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is supposed to guard against racial discrimination in voting. Though its powers have been severely undermined by the conservative majority on the US Supreme Court, some protections remain, particularly against the dilution of voting rights for historically underrepresented communities. Casar’s fear, and that of many others, is that the high court might allow Texas to further erode these protections.]
This can be a departure from previous practices, even for Republicans, isn’t it?
Sure. Often there’s some limits on craven right-wing gerrymandering in pink states. Often, they’re restricted by Republican congressional incumbents wanting their districts to remain typically the identical, so they don’t seem to be too weak in elections. And, additionally, whereas a lot of the Voting Rights Act has been gutted, the Republicans haven’t been prepared to utterly ignore it.
These have been the 2 limits on probably the most excessive types of racial, right-wing gerrymandering. Trump goes “no limits.” He’s saying, “Screw even the neighborhoods and districts of Republican members of Congress. Screw each a part of the Voting Rights Act.” Trump is ignoring any half that’s left of the Voting Rights Act and saying that that is about Trump’s safety first. And that’s what we’re going to get subsequent week within the Texas legislative session. And the query is: Will Republicans lastly begin discovering a spine when Trump is working over their very own districts and electoral futures? And can Texas Democrats mobilize, and can Democrats mobilize nationwide, as a result of this can be a nationwide voting rights concern?
It seems to be like Trump needs to maneuver quick on this—to get maps redrawn properly earlier than the 2026 marketing campaign ramps up.
That is all about Trump wanting to forestall any type of accountability for himself.
As we realized in 2018, when there was a Democratic wave throughout the first Trump administration, it created a possibility for Home Democrats to research Trump’s corruption and to start out reining in a few of Trump’s worst abuses. Trump doesn’t need that to occur once more. So he’s threatening Texas Republican members of Congress, and Republican legislators, and telling them to mess up their very own districts, suppress their very own voters, have interaction on this loopy, unprecedented stage of gerrymandering, and, finally, shatter what stays of the Voting Rights Act, all to profit Trump. These Texas Republicans must resolve whether or not to characterize the pursuits of their voters and their very own electoral pursuits, or whether or not they’re simply Trump’s water boys.
Widespread
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
Properly, what we now have seen in an terrible lot of circumstances, Congressman…
I do know, they typically don’t have any spine and simply resolve to be waterboys.
If Republicans in Congress and the legislatures go together with this, that would considerably undermine Democratic prospects in 2026.
The 2 key assumptions which have held collectively the concept that we now have big alternatives in 2026 are: One, that Trump wouldn’t run over his personal Republican incumbents. And, two, that Part Two of the Voting Rights Act would maintain.
Trump is difficult these assumptions. He’s saying that he doesn’t care if he threatens, or makes extra weak, his personal Republican members.
And, two, [Trump and the Republicans] are saying they’re prepared to go to unprecedented lengths to cut up communities of curiosity underneath the Voting Rights Act.
If Trump does these two issues, and does them efficiently, then, you’re proper, we might find yourself with an especially unfair and rigged election system in 2026. And, if we don’t combat again, with every part we’ve bought, if we don’t acknowledge that this can be a five-alarm fireplace, we’re giving Trump an open lane to do these two issues.
Extra from The Nation

She’s working on a populist financial message that places affordability of care at its coronary heart and mobilized younger grassroots organizers.

Voters aren’t tuning out as a result of they don’t care. They’re tuning out as a result of they’ve been exhausted by pretend selections, bought out by each events, and bored with inauthenticity.

Progressive politicians should decide to increasing the courtroom, or voters ought to pledge their assist to different candidates who will.