Too simply dismissed as hyperbole, the Antifa fable is getting used as a weapon to destroy home opposition.
Donald Trump attends the 2025 Ryder Cup at Black Course at Bethpage State Park Golf Course on September 26, 2025, in Farmingdale, New York.
(Mandel Ngan / Pool / Getty Pictures)
Donald Trump’s authoritarianism has develop into more and more brazen because the assassination of Charlie Kirk. However mainstream journalists have failed to explain the complete extent of Trump’s newly energized radicalism, selecting to concentrate on whether or not his ravings are factual or authorized moderately than inspecting the bigger ideological targets he’s pursuing.
Final Monday, for example, Trump signed an government order declaring that “Antifa” is a “home terrorist group.” On Thursday, he signed a nationwide safety directive that, within the phrases of high aide Stephen Miller, would create an “all-of-government effort to dismantle left wing terrorism.” When requested who was funding such “left wing terrorism,” Trump named two top funders of the Democratic Social gathering and allied mainstream liberal causes, George Soros and Reid Hoffman. The concentrating on of those two has produced tangible advantages for Trump; on Friday, The New York Occasions reported that, though the Soros household stays dedicated to political engagement, Hoffman “has largely vanished from political giving in 2025 and is far much less publicly voluble about his disagreements with Mr. Trump.”
On Saturday, Trump posted that he was authorizing so-called “Secretary of Struggle” Pete Hegseth to “present all mandatory Troops to guard Struggle ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Services underneath siege from assault by Antifa, and different home terrorists.” Trump licensed the usage of “Full Pressure, if mandatory” for the deployment. Portland thus joins the ranks of American cities that Trump has both despatched or plans to ship troops to, a listing that features Washington, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Memphis.
The Portland deployment, together with the smearing of Democratic Social gathering donors as terrorist supporters, reveals that Trump is utilizing the specter of Antifa as an ideological rationalization for his crackdown on home political opponents.
But a lot of the preliminary reporting on Trump’s government order swerved this apparent reality, focusing as an alternative on narrower, extra technical questions in regards to the feasibility of an anti-antifa campaign. The New York Occasions reported that “there are main factual and authorized challenges to any authorities effort to formally designate antifa a terrorist group in any substantive approach.”
That is very clearly true. One downside is that antifa isn’t actually a corporation however, because the Occasions precisely notes, “a label for a political subculture or protest fashion. The phenomenon doesn’t have a frontrunner, an initiation course of, membership rolls, a headquarters, a checking account or a centralized construction.” And even when Antifa had been an precise establishment, there are not any authorized provisions for designating a home group as a terrorist group. Legally, the “terrorist” designation applies solely to overseas teams.
However whereas these factual and authorized observations are start line for criticizing Trump’s actions, they hardly seize the true nature of his challenge.
Antifa, as utilized by Trump and his cronies, is a fable. Truth-checking a fable is rarely a totally sufficient response, because it doesn’t handle the emotional enchantment the parable serves. Mark Bray, a historian on the Rutgers College and writer of Antifa: the Antifascist Handbook (2017), famous in an interview that the people who determine as antifa haven’t been “out on the street a lot lately anyway” and are definitely not being funded by billionaires like Soros. Relatively, Trump makes use of Antifa as a “boogeyman catchall class” for all types of tendencies the suitable opposes. Black Lives Matter, trans rights, and immigrant rights have all been lumped in with antifa and terrorism.
The Soros fiction has overtones of the Nazi myth of Judeo-Bolshevism. The Nazis concocted the fantasy that rich Jews had been subverting German society by financing revolution: an ideological chimera that allowed the Nazis to pose as opponents of each unpopular plutocrats and scary plebeians. The parable of Soros-funded Antifa may serve an identical perform for Trumpism: uniting the populist and law-and-order factions of the suitable.
The Antifa fable is elastic sufficient to embody the broad sweep of opposition to Trump, liberals in addition to radicals.
Writing on his Substack, journalist Ken Klippenstein reports that the nationwide safety directive signed by Trump has far-reaching implications. Modeled after the Struggle on Terror method to teams corresponding to Al Qaeda, the directive authorizes legislation enforcement to preemptively disrupt teams that is likely to be a risk. The “indicia” or indicators of violence within the report are alarmingly broad. As Klippenstein notes, they embody:
• anti-Americanism,
• anti-capitalism,
• anti-Christianity,
• help for the overthrow of america Authorities,
• extremism on migration,
• extremism on race,
• extremism on gender,
• hostility in the direction of those that maintain conventional American views on household,
• hostility in the direction of those that maintain conventional American views on faith, and
• hostility in the direction of those that maintain conventional American views on morality.
The Trump administration appears intent on utilizing these new directives to assault the free speech rights of its critics. On Wednesday, Stephen Miller tweeted, “This language incites violence and terrorism,” in response to California Governor Gavin Newsom’s criticism of ICE and the Trump administration as “authoritarian.”
Well-liked
“swipe left under to view extra authors”Swipe →
Greg Sargent, a author for The New Republic, asked former Trump adviser Steve Bannon “if he thinks Miller’s tweet means federal legislation enforcement ought to and can now criminally examine teams who describe ICE as ‘authoritarian.’”
Bannon responded, “Sure. Stephen Miller is appropriate—extra importantly he’s in cost.”
The Antifa fable is a wedge that might be used to destroy free speech. It’s not sufficient to easily level out that it’s a fable. Relatively, Democrats must rally People with the argument that the risk to Antifa will in the future be used towards anybody who speaks out towards Trump.
Don’t let JD Vance silence our unbiased journalism
On September 15, Vice President JD Vance attacked The Nation whereas internet hosting The Charlie Kirk Present.
In a clip seen thousands and thousands of occasions, Vance singled out The Nation in a canine whistle to his far-right followers. Predictably, a torrent of abuse adopted.
All through our 160 years of publishing fierce, unbiased journalism, we’ve operated with the idea that dissent is the very best type of patriotism. We’ve been criticized by each Democratic and Republican officeholders—and we’re happy that the White Home is studying The Nation. So long as Vance is free to criticize us and we’re free to criticize him, the American experiment will proceed because it ought to.
To appropriate the report on Vance’s false claims in regards to the supply of our funding: The Nation is proudly reader-supported by progressives such as you who help unbiased journalism and gained’t be intimidated by these in energy.
Vance and Trump administration officers additionally laid out their plans for widespread repression towards progressive teams. As an alternative of calling for nationwide therapeutic, the administration is utilizing Kirk’s dying as pretext for a concerted assault on Trump’s enemies on the left.
Now we all know The Nation is entrance and heart on their minds.
Your help in the present day will make our important work doable within the months and years forward. If you believe in the First Amendment right to maintain a free and independent press, please donate today.
With gratitude,
Bhaskar Sunkara
President, The Nation
Extra from The Nation

They successfully management our fates, however deep down, they know they’re sniveling, pathetic, and insufficient, and it eats them up.

Overseas bots had been spewing a lot of the racist rhetoric that adopted Charlie Kirk’s killing. And but it solely gained traction as a result of there’s loads of homegrown racism to use….



