Jon Wiener: From The Nation journal, that is Begin Making Sense. I’m Jon Wiener. Later within the present: the VA should finish homelessness amongst disabled vets, by offering housing: that’s what the ninth circuit courtroom of appeals ordered in a historic ruling. Mark Rosenbaum of Public Counsel will clarify. However first: Trump, Venezuela, and American politics: John Nichols has our evaluation – in a minute.
[BREAK]
We’ve been saying for months that, as Trump’s help shrinks, and his psychological state deteriorates, he would change into extra harmful. We noticed the primary fruits of that over the weekend when he despatched 150 planes to assault Venezuela, killing one thing like 80 folks, with the purpose, he says, of taking up Venezuela’s oil fields and “working the nation.” For remark, we flip to John Nichols, he’s govt editor of The Nation. John, welcome again.
John Nichols: It’s nice to be with you, Jon. Thanks for having me.
JW: Trump known as the operation, “An assault like folks haven’t seen since World Struggle II,” and he stated it was, “One of the vital beautiful, efficient and highly effective shows of American navy may and competence in American historical past.”
Democrats would after all like to spend all of their time speaking concerning the excessive value of groceries, vitality, housing, healthcare, Trump’s tariffs, however that in all probability received’t be attainable for the following few weeks. Affordability will virtually definitely be the large situation this fall through the midterms, however for now, Democrats want a message on Venezuela. What do you assume that message must be?
JN: That the American persons are proper, and we must belief them. The Reuters/Ipsos ballot, which was finished within the speedy aftermath of the assault, however definitely with sufficient days handed so that folks knew what had occurred and had heard all the President’s spin. The response by the American folks was solely about one third supported, believed that it was a good suggestion to go in and do what was finished.
So the underside line is People don’t like this concept. For Democrats, that’s a fairly good base from which to construct. And the one ask I’d have is that they’d be as daring and brave of their language as Republicans Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Now, I wish to emphasize Massie and Greene will not be coronary heart and soul of the present Republican Get together. They’re on its fringe for quite a lot of causes. However I believe particularly with Greene, and I believe additionally to an extent with Massie, they’ve substantial help and alliances with parts of that MAGA base. And if they’re snug saying, “This can be a warfare for oil,” which is principally what Massie is saying flat out. Democrats must be simply as snug. And actually, I’d argue, bolder.
JW: This can be a warfare for oil. It’s a warfare to make the oil firms wealthy. It’s not onerous to make that argument. That is principally what the President stated in his speech. He talked about oil 25 occasions in his press convention on Saturday. He didn’t speak about bringing democracy or freedom to Venezuela. He stated, “We’re going to have our very giant United States oil firms, the largest anyplace on this planet, go in, spend billions of {dollars}, repair the badly damaged oil infrastructure and begin creating wealth.” That is type of the other of Iraq and Afghanistan the place the entire level was “we’re going to deliver democracy and freedom to the world.” He’s not saying that now. And actually, he’s protecting in energy your entire regime except the chief of that regime. It’s not a warfare for regime change, and he’s made that very clear.
JN: Yeah. I imply, look, there’s a posh debate happening now across the time period “regime change.” I’d argue, name me naïve, while you take away the sitting president, that could be regime change, even when among the people who find themselves round that president stay. And even when it isn’t regime change in a full sense that among the identical folks will stay round, the pressures on them to function in a really totally different manner, I believe type of transfer us a bit into that class. With that stated, the factor we’ve to deal with, the factor we’ve to utterly acknowledge is that that is about oil. Venezuela sits on the most important quantified reserve of oil on this planet and it’s underdeveloped. And I believe for any individual like Donald Trump and lots of of his allies, they have a look at a spot like that and it will get them excited in methods you may barely describe as a result of—
JW: Paul Krugman has a barely totally different view. He wrote, “You already know who doesn’t assume there’s some huge cash to be made in Venezuela? The oil firms.” And that’s as a result of the world value of oil proper now could be low. These of us who watched landman on TV know that when the worth of oil reaches round $60 a barrel, you cease drilling, you’ve lay off your cruise, you break your leases. And that’s the place we’re proper now. It’s not worthwhile to drill new wells even in West Texas, a lot much less in a faraway nation the place the infrastructure wants billions of {dollars} of restructuring and the place the political future is, allow us to say, unsure.
JN: Yeah. However right here’s a bit of one thing about oil firm executives. On the finish of the day, when you present them a spot and also you say, “There’s an entire lot of oil there and it’d take some effort to get to it, however america authorities goes to again you up.” My sense is that they are going to discover any individual who desires to, on the very least, inform Donald Trump that they’re going to get the oil. Additionally, oil costs fluctuate, my buddy. On the finish of the day, it’s all the time about oil. It was in Iraq. It seems to be right here. And I don’t assume we serve ourselves effectively by denying it. I believe we should always acknowledge that even when it’s silly, it’s actuality, as a result of bear in mind, Iraq was fairly silly as effectively in a variety of methods. However then right here’s the opposite factor that I’d put within the combine right here, and I believe it is a huge deal. Will we not run the chance if we go down this street of getting that President or different figures world wide have a look at international locations and say, “You already know what? There’s any individual there on the bottom who’s in the best way of us getting the sources we would like.” And when you enter a “new world order” by which violent interactions with international locations, as much as and together with regime change, is perhaps “justified” by the seek for sources within the minds of these in energy, that’s a really harmful new place to go.
What occurs if a handful of actually highly effective international locations world wide determine that’s how they’re going to function? There must be no less than some deep dialogue about whether or not that is the way you wish to arrange the world going ahead.
JW: Particularly since working Venezuela for the oil firms shouldn’t be going to assist Trump win again the thousands and thousands of people that turned in opposition to him after voting for him as a result of he promised the decrease costs and didn’t. This isn’t going to work to assist him with the citizens and he’ll be dragging down different Republicans as we get nearer to the midterms. So the apparent factor for Trump to do, he likes to really feel sturdy, is invade someplace else. How about Greenland?
JN: Individuals at Greenland are fairly scared proper now. Look, we must be trying all around the world at locations the place not simply america, however different international locations might want territory. And so that you have a look at China and Taiwan, clearly you have a look at Russia and Ukraine, but in addition within the latest commentary about Venezuela, you heard some very startling statements from Donald Trump and others about Columbia and about Mexico.
And I’m not suggesting what comes subsequent as a result of I don’t know. However what I’m suggesting is that when you type of break that barrier and say, “We will fly in, seize the sitting president of a spot, fly him out to strive in our nation on fees that we’ve developed” — the place does that finish?”
And when you’re keen to go to that extent, are you keen to explode NATO with a transfer on Greenland? Will we run the chance of getting into a kind of twenty first century variations of the outdated nice energy negotiations the place they’re like, “Effectively, we’ll let you could have this when you give us that”?
Now we have seen potentialities that we don’t like, instructions that we don’t wish to go in and it falls to Congress to talk up in very, very blunt methods in protection of worldwide regulation and in addition home regulation that you simply don’t invade and transfer into launch main navy actions and definitely the removing of the town president of a sovereign nation is a serious navy motion with out approval from Congress, with out no less than some session with Congress.
What we all know at this level is earlier than the assault, there was no session with Congress, not even with pleasant Republicans. And what we additionally know is that there was session with billionaires, oil firm folks, and others. Now we have an administration that consults with wealth and energy however doesn’t seek the advice of with the small democratically elected representatives of the folks. This can be a place the place at our greatest we pull the breaks and we are saying, “Maintain it. Now we have to speak about this. “
And also you search for bipartisan alliances with that handful of principled Republicans who really get that it is a very unhealthy thought, and also you communicate to the American individuals who frankly get it. They’re saying, once more, roughly 33, 34% assume that what we did in Venezuela was positive and good, however that signifies that overwhelming majority of People have some discomfort with it and that discomfort is the premise from which to open up an actual dialogue about American international coverage, how we function on this planet. And you’ll couple it with home coverage as a result of we actually are in a scenario the place we’re saying we don’t come up with the money for to feed hungry folks, however we do come up with the money for to go flying world wide upending governments.
Right here’s the underside line, the conceitedness of Trump and the folks round him is kind of startling. You may be capable of make instances on Maduro, definitely, I imply, I believe loads of folks have, however on the identical token, they by no means did what Bush and Cheney did. And I’m no defender of Bush and Cheney, however no less than they spent a variety of time attempting to make the case.
Now they lied quite a bit, however no less than they really went to the meticulous work of mendacity to The New York Occasions and The Washington Submit in nice element. I believe on this case, there’s an incredible conceitedness in merely deciding, “Okay, we’re simply going to do that. And the climate’s good immediately.” Which once more, bear in mind, within the run as much as the Iraq warfare, though I felt that that warfare was wrongly launched and that it failed to fulfill the requirements of the Structure with a transparent declaration of warfare, there have been no less than these debates about authorization to make use of a navy drive. And once more, based mostly on lies, perceive all that, however no less than there was time and the American folks heard one thing about it. On this case, Trump principally stated, “I’m making my transfer immediately.” Right here’s the place the issue comes. Should you do this and it really works, until Congress pushes again on you in a basic manner and a really, very clear language from Democrats and Republicans, what’s to cease you from doing it the following time?
JW: Yeah. One very last thing earlier than we allow you to go. Your Minnesota Second, information from my hometown of St. Paul. On Monday, Minnesota Governor Tim Waltz, former vice-presidential candidate, introduced he was withdrawing from his personal reelection race after an enormous scandal involving greater than a billion {dollars} in fraudulent funds from Medicaid.
Republicans thought for a short while they’d a very good likelihood of electing a Governor for the primary time in Minnesota since 2006. And so there’s an enormous main, greater than half a dozen persons are working for the Republican nomination. Seems like Amy Klobuchar would be the Democratic candidate. The Republican main has received just one candidate who’s actually well-known, the Pillow Man. And Trump himself says Michael Lindell, the pillow man, deserves to be Governor. Who do you assume would win an election in Minnesota between Amy Klobuchar and the Pillow Man?
JN: I’m suspecting that Amy Klobuchar would do fairly effectively. Look, I’ve coated Minnesota politics for a very long time. I come from Wisconsin, however they’re each higher Midwest states with historic progressive traditions and have traditionally have leaned a bit of bit to the Democrats, not all the best way. And look, Minnesota’s a purple state. It’s not a deep blue Democratic state, however in that context, Amy Klobuchar is tremendous common. I’ve been up there. I’ve seen her campaigns. She wins huge. There’s a variety of controversy round partitions. I believe a lot of it very unfair, which he’s going to, I believe, work on this final yr of his governorship to handle, however Klobuchar hasn’t been there. She’s been in Washington. And so there’s a political calculus right here to deliver somebody from outdoors again dwelling who could be very common. And my sense is that it’s unlikely that Minnesota finally ends up with a Republican Governor.
By the identical token, there’s a variety of churn in Minnesota proper now. Klobuchar is a really a lot of a centrist Democrat. There are some progressives who would have favored to have seen an open main. There’s going to be the query of who will get her Senate seat if she is elected as Governor. So we’ll be paying a variety of consideration to Minnesota for an entire bunch of causes. And why that makes me glad, Jon, is that I can do “Your Minnesota Second” frequently by the approaching yr.
JW: [LAUGHTER] Thanks very a lot!
I need you to inform us what’s on the quilt of the brand new situation of The Nation journal.
JN: A superb illustration by Edward Sorel of the White Home with wild canines roaring out of it.
JW: Ah, “Trump lets free the canines of warfare.” John Nichols – learn him at thenation.com. John, thanks for speaking with us immediately.
JN: Recognize it, my buddy.
[BREAK]
Jon Wiener: Los Angeles is well-known for the tens of hundreds of homeless folks sleeping on the streets. And in keeping with the town’s most up-to-date official depend, about 3,000 of them are veterans, lots of whom have disabilities, together with traumatic mind harm and PTSD.
LA can also be the house of an enormous physique of land formally devoted to housing disabled veterans. It’s an attractive 400-acre gated campus in Brentwood, west of UCLA. And but the VA refused to settle a category motion go well with by disabled homeless vets looking for housing there. The VA demanded a trial, which they then misplaced; after which the VA had the chutzpah to enchantment to the Ninth Circuit. And eventually on the finish of December, they misplaced that enchantment. The Ninth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals in LA ordered the VA to construct greater than 2,500 items of housing on its West LA campus.
The lead lawyer for the disabled homeless vets of their class motion go well with is Mark Rosenbaum. He’s senior particular counsel on the group Public Counsel. He’s argued landmark instances earlier than the Supreme Courtroom 4 occasions, and greater than two dozen earlier than federal courts of enchantment and the California State Supreme Courtroom. And some many years in the past, he additionally represented me in a Freedom of Info lawsuit for the John Lennon FBI information. He joins us now: Mark Rosenbaum, welcome again — and congratulations on this big victory for vets.
Mark Rosenbaum: Effectively, thanks. I’m very happy with what Public Counsel did on this case. We had help from three main regulation companies, Sidley Austin, Robins Kaplan, Brown Goldstein in DC. And honestly, this case was received not by attorneys, however by these disabled veterans, fight warriors in Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, who stepped ahead when the VA refused to acquiesce with respect to this, informed their tales, painful, troublesome tales of braveness, and that’s actually what received the case.
JW: What has been the official coverage of the VA in the direction of offering housing for homeless vets, particularly the disabled vets?
MR: Effectively, that’s straightforward: the official coverage has been to state that they’re dedicated to that — in grasp plans, in official paperwork. Each president, no matter political occasion, comes ahead and says, “We’re going to finish veteran homelessness.” And the truth is none have. And the truth is that, absent litigation in Los Angeles, there can be no housing in any respect. You’re proper while you say LA is the homeless capital for veterans in america, all the time has been. The quantity’s really nearer to three,400, and it’s not happening. However the official place of VA when it comes to homeless veterans is markedly totally different from its precise place, and that’s to, as you stated, struggle, struggle, struggle the veterans who served this nation in its time of want, and now have been abandoned by the VA of their time of want.
JW: And this LA land is particular as a result of it was donated to the folks of america in 1888, and the deed requires that these 388 acres be used to supply housing for disabled vets.
MR: Right. And as you stated, that was speculated to be a soldier’s dwelling. That was a selected intent in offering this property, which even again in 1888 was prime actual property. And it labored that manner. It labored that manner by the Spanish-American Struggle, World Struggle I, World Struggle II, and the Korean Struggle. For 80 years, there have been as many as 4,000 vets on this land. They’d a village, they’d locations of worship, they’d recreation facilities. There was a group there. However with Vietnam, that every one modified. And the VA did an about face and commenced leasing this property supposed for veterans to rent-a-car locations, a non-public college, to UCLA for its baseball diamond, a canine park, oil drilling. The VA itself in its official reviews has stated that thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of {dollars} went for these leases, none of which really profit veterans themselves.
JW: I perceive the VA argued in 1971 that the earthquake that yr created a security situation within the buildings that housed vets. And they also evicted everyone at that time, however they by no means repaired these buildings.
MR: Effectively, that’s a lie. The VA continues again then and continues now to accommodate officers, to accommodate VA officers, to accommodate medical doctors, to function medical amenities. It didn’t have something to do with an earthquake. It had nothing to do with that. What it had as a substitute to do with was one of many nice land scandals within the historical past of this nation, and that’s the use of this property to line people’ earnings, and as I stated, to function a rental automotive place or for oil drilling, nothing having to do to profit veterans. The UCLA baseball group continues to play on that property as if it’s the house with the Bruins and never the house of the courageous.
JW: So inform us about this Ninth Circuit Appeals Courtroom ruling on the finish of December and its significance.
MR: It’s a landmark ruling. It’s crucial choice on behalf of veterans within the historical past of the nation. As you acknowledged, the Ninth Circuit in a unanimous choice, three decide courtroom, unanimous choice, held that Decide Carter, the district courtroom decide who heard the trial that you simply had been mentioning, acted correctly in figuring out, to begin with, that the case may very well be dropped at courtroom. The VA argued strenuously that instances to determine rights, to acknowledge rights by veterans had no enterprise in a federal courtroom. That argument was rejected.
Decide Carter additionally held that the Rehabilitation Act, which as you realize, is a Nationwide Incapacity Rights Act utilized right here for veterans who had been homeless, that unhoused veterans couldn’t entry vital healthcare to which they had been entitled, psychological healthcare, bodily healthcare, that as long as they had been homeless, they may as effectively have been on Mars, when it comes to accessing that healthcare. And the Ninth Circuit affirmed that ruling, and that may be a choice that’s not solely precedent right here in Los Angeles, it’s precedent to the Ninth Circuit, which is seven states on the West, however its reasoning is relevant all through the nation. So this must be the top of veteran homelessness within the nation, and the Ninth Circuit held that.
And the Ninth Circuit held that the leases that we’re speaking about violated congressional regulation as a result of, and also you didn’t need to be a constitutional or a authorized scholar to determine this out, an oil drilling operation doesn’t “principally profit veterans.” And the courtroom struck down a lot of these leases.
JW: There’s a second observe that’s been going. When you’ve been suing the VA on behalf of homeless disabled vets, Trump issued an govt order final Might, directing the VA to accommodate 6,000 homeless veterans at its West LA Middle. And to current an motion plan by January 1st, 2028.
6,000 is much more than the two,500 items in your settlement, and but it’s the Trump administration that’s been preventing you in courtroom over constructing 2,500 items, and the pinnacle of the VA is a Trump appointee. So what’s going on with the VA and Trump’s govt order?
MR: Effectively, let me say, to begin with, we’re not simply speaking about housing. We’re speaking about housing with supportive companies in order that people can get social staff and psychological well being consultants and others to help them to entry that healthcare.
JW: That is underneath the settlement that you’ve got received, not the chief order.
MR: Yeah, not a settlement. We needed to struggle for that call. Beneath the ruling it’s additionally 750 short-term items. And that’s extraordinary. Which means we’re not going to have to attend years for the development of housing. It signifies that there are modular items that may very well be introduced on that campus proper now.
You’re completely proper. The Trump administration issued an govt order. The Ninth Circuit, in truth, requested the events to temporary the significance of that order. Nonetheless, within the choice that was only in the near past issued, the chief order wasn’t talked about. And the reply to that’s fairly apparent. That govt order exists on paper. It doesn’t exist in observe. It was, as you stated, supposedly a plan to assemble housing, to construct a group heart, to actually make the land, as you stated earlier, perform the intention of those that donated the land over 150 years in the past. We haven’t seen something of it, nor has Congress appropriated a single penny for the precise building of that housing pursuant to the chief order, nor to our data, has the administration gone to Congress and requested for that. So it’s a chunk of paper, nevertheless it’s an unfulfilled promise, which once more, underscores the significance of this litigation to create an enforceable order, which I can let you know we and the veterans are going to vigorously implement.
JW: I simply need to say, my favourite a part of Trump’s govt order on housing for vets in West LA is that, whereas he doesn’t say something about asking Congress for cash to do that, he does say that every one federal companies ought to be sure that funds which were spent on housing “unlawful aliens” be “redirected to assemble, set up, and keep housing for vets” in West LA. I didn’t know the federal authorities supplied housing for “unlawful aliens,” besides at these ICE detention facilities. How a lot cash has Trump’s order on that rating introduced in?
MR: Lower than zero. Not a penny. It makes for good political propaganda, I suppose, however when it comes to serving to a single veteran, zero.
JW: I perceive that this lawsuit started whereas Biden was president and has been continued by Trump. So that you’ve been preventing each the Democrats and the Republicans now for a few years. What do you make of that?
MR: Each president involves the time period and says, ‘One among my first precedence goes to make sure that each veteran will get what they deserve for functions of coping with the seen and the invisible wounds of warfare that they endure.’ Day-after-day is meant to be Veterans Day. In actuality, there isn’t a Veterans Day. No administration has carried by. And even previous to President Biden, and President Trump in his first time period, and President Obama, no administration has really adopted by and voluntarily constructed any housing, and that’s why we’ve needed to proceed to sue them.
JW: Now, there’s one exception to the sample you’re speaking about, which was in 2015, you and the ACLU received a serious settlement from the VA. They agreed in 2015 to supply housing for homeless vets on that LA land. At that time, they agreed to create 1,200 items. And actually, you and I talked about it right here on this present, in 2015. It’s 10 years later. Why was this nonetheless being litigated this yr? What occurred to the 2015 settlement that you simply received?
MR: Effectively, Decide Carter requested me that the primary day that we appeared in courtroom within the Powers case, the present case. And I stated to him what I stated publicly, and that’s we made an egregious error. As a lawyer, it’s essentially the most critical error I’ve made in courtroom. I believe it’s malpractice. What we did is we trusted the federal government. We didn’t receive an enforceable order. And when it got here time, when the federal government, years into the settlement, had not constructed a single unit of latest housing for veterans, and we stated to the federal government, “It’s time to come clean with this, the federal government stated, “You don’t have an enforceable order.” And that’s why we had to return into courtroom. And I can let you know this time we made sure that the order was enforceable. And as I stated earlier, if we’ve to implement it, we’ll implement it as vigorously as we’ve the flexibility to do. So this time the veterans have received and there’s going to be no retreat.
JW: One other infuriating a part of the previous VA practices on these grounds is that they require that the housing be constructed by personal builders who need to receive their very own financing. Now, that is moving into the weeds a bit of bit, nevertheless it has been an enormous impediment to constructing something there as a result of competing for low-income housing tax credit, which is an especially advanced Reaganite thought about the best way to pay for this kind of factor, has been an enormous impediment and itself slows down every kind of homeless and reasonably priced housing in Los Angeles, for years.
The VA is now underneath a authorized obligation to construct hundreds of items. They don’t have the cash but of their finances. I appeared up — how a lot is that this going to value? 2,500 items value one thing like $600,000, possibly as a lot as $900,000 per unit in LA. That is going to value one thing like $2 billion. Looks as if an enormous sum of money, however the VA finances this yr is greater than $400 billion. So when it comes to the VA finances, it’s not some huge cash. How’s this going to be speculated to be financed now?
MR: Effectively, there’s a number of factors there and also you hit all of them. To start with, the Ninth Circuit accurately stated that what it could take to finance the housing items which are required to get veterans off the streets is 0.02% of the VA finances. The VA and the Protection Division have the 2 highest budgets in all the federal authorities. That is like spare change when it comes to what it should really value the VA.
Furthermore, as I requested the VA officers in courtroom, I requested them, “How a lot is a veteran value?” They usually stated “that quantity couldn’t presumably be calculated” and on that they had been precisely proper. The opposite factor that makes it even worse earlier than I reply your query immediately is that not solely did the VA refuse to pay for the housing itself, and by the way, there’s housing for medical doctors on that campus, there’s housing for VA officers on that campus.
Should you go on the market now, there’s tons of building for VA. So the notion that they will’t construct housing, each the Courtroom of Enchantment and the district courtroom stated was completely with none help in any respect.
However to make issues worse, what the VA additionally stated was that these personal builders may impose revenue necessities that included the compensation, the incapacity compensation that veterans in truth acquired. So we went to courtroom to say that will get it precisely mistaken. That may be a facial violation, a transparent violation of rehabilitation regulation. In different phrases, the extra disabled you might be, the extra you suffered PTSD and mind trauma, lack of limbs, the much less you’ll be eligible for the housing within the first place; 38 out of the 46 buildings on that grounds have these types of necessities, which makes completely ineligible the veterans who’re most in want. Should you wished to create a system that stated to veterans, “Maintain out of your individual land,” that is the system you’ll develop.
How is it going to get financed? To start with, we didn’t ask that query just lately when it comes to how a lot it could value to go after Venezuelan boats, or to contain the federal government in different adventures the place women and men like those that at the moment are on the streets are serving the nation. Nobody requested the place they’re going to get the cash for that. The cash isn’t going to be a difficulty. That is an enforceable obligation. I’m not apprehensive that we received’t get the cash. And what Congressperson is publicly going to face up and say, “I don’t vote to assist homeless veterans.”
JW: Mark Rosenbaum – he’s the lead lawyer within the lawsuit on behalf of homeless disabled veterans. This can be a ruling that must be the top of veterans’ homelessness in every single place in america. Mark, thanks for all of your work on this, and thanks for speaking with us immediately.
MR: It’s nice to speak to you. It’s my pleasure to have the ability to be concerned in these instances, however I’m not being conceited after I say this wasn’t my victory, it’s the victory of those vets – and I’m happy to be a really small a part of that.
