Mamdani and Brad Lander show they know the best way to say “no” to a lawless president and his battle—whereas rival Andrew Cuomo stumbles.
After President Trump ordered a US navy assault on Iran Saturday evening, the outcry from Democrats and a handful of Republicans in Washington was quick. US Consultant Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) announced, “The President’s disastrous choice to bomb Iran with out authorization is a grave violation of the Structure and Congressional Struggle Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a battle which will ensnare us for generations. It’s completely and clearly grounds for impeachment.” Former Home Judiciary Committee chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said, “The President’s choice to bomb Iran was grossly unconstitutional, since solely Congress has the facility to declare battle. The President’s motion will unquestionably result in many American, Israeli and Iranian deaths and have to be condemned within the strongest attainable phrases.” Even New York’s Hakeem Jeffries, the normally cautious Democratic minority chief within the Home, objected that “President Trump misled the nation about his intentions, failed to hunt congressional authorization for using navy power and dangers American entanglement in a probably disastrous battle within the Center East.”
Ocasio-Cortez, Nadler, and Jeffries weren’t the one New York Metropolis Democrats who spoke up. Two main contenders in Tuesday’s Democratic mayoral major, Zohran Mamdani and Brad Lander, delivered strong condemnations of Trump’s transfer, signaling their dedication to push again in opposition to a lawless president. However the embattled front-runner within the race, former New York governor Andrew Cuomo, failed to reply initially after which despatched blended alerts that strengthened a way that he lacks the political independence and integrity to face as much as Trump.
Mamdani, a state legislator who has shaken up the race together with his spirited progressive candidacy, surged within the remaining days earlier than Tuesday’s election—with an Emerson School poll launched Monday even suggesting that he may narrowly defeat Cuomo within the remaining spherical of ranked-choice voting. Somebody pursuing a seismic victory of such consequence for town and the nation is perhaps anticipated to decide on warning when responding to so quick and critical a transfer by the president of america. However Mamdani pulled no punches when Trump attacked. On Saturday evening, he declared, “Donald Trump ran for president promising to finish wars, not begin new ones. At this time’s unconstitutional navy motion represents a darkish, new chapter in his limitless betrayals that now threaten to plunge the world deeper into chaos.”
Present Difficulty
Mamdani, an outspoken critic of US overseas coverage within the Center East—particularly American help for the Israeli assault on Gaza—argued that the assault on Iran would have penalties for New Yorkers. “In a metropolis as world as ours, the impacts of battle are felt deeply right here at residence. I’m pondering of the New Yorkers with family members in hurt’s manner,” he defined, at some extent when bombs had been falling all through the Center East. “Whereas Donald Trump bears quick accountability for this unlawful escalation, these actions are the results of a political institution that may reasonably spend trillions of {dollars} on weapons than carry hundreds of thousands out of poverty, launch limitless wars whereas silencing requires peace, and fearmonger about outsiders whereas billionaires hole out our democracy from inside. For Individuals center aged and youthful, that is all we have now identified. We can not settle for it any longer.”
Mamdani’s highly effective message was echoed by Lander, the New York Metropolis comptroller who has fashioned a late-stage tag group with Mamdani within the waning weeks of the mayoral race. Lander said, “Trump’s reckless and unconstitutional strikes in opposition to Iran are a harmful escalation of battle—and threaten numerous Iranian, Israeli and American lives. My ideas are with households fearing for his or her security, and the 1000’s of New Yorkers worrying tonight about family members in Iran.”
And what of Cuomo? Within the hours after the assault, his marketing campaign was busy posting photos of the candidate using in a truck. Then, he was touting an endorsement from the last word institution Democrat, former president Invoice Clinton. Concerning the administration’s bombing of Iran, the Cuomo-friendly New York Put up announced on Sunday morning, “The Cuomo marketing campaign had no quick touch upon the US airstrikes.”
When the previous governor lastly spoke up on Sunday afternoon, Politico reported, “Cuomo informed reporters Sunday he supported taking out Iran’s nuclear services.” Whereas he advised that he wished the president had consulted Congress, Cuomo echoed speaking factors from the White Home and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, claiming that the assault made the world a “safer place.”
Cuomo’s failure to name out Trump with the readability or power employed by Mamdani and Lander sparked contemporary criticism of each the Cuomo marketing campaign and the numerous billionaire Trump backers who’re supporting Cuomo’s candidacy. Mamdani tweeted on Sunday, “Cuomo’s greatest donors are cheering Trump on. These are the MAGA warmongers who would have his ear in Metropolis Corridor.”
There will probably be those that counsel that Trump’s battle isn’t an applicable situation for dialogue within the New York mayoral race. However they might be unsuitable. Along with the humane concerns cited by Mamdani and Lander—and New York’s standing as the last word worldwide metropolis—there’s the basic actuality that an already bloated Pentagon price range is rising at an exponential price beneath Trump, all whereas funding for healthcare, training, and transportation will get squeezed.
Progressives have lengthy argued that New York Metropolis wants a mayor who acknowledges that the exponential progress of the military-industrial complicated comes at a value for taxpayers and the residents of nice American cities—and who’s keen to name out that price on behalf of working-class households.
The town had such a mayor within the Nineteen Sixties: John Lindsay.
When Lindsay first ran for mayor of New York Metropolis in 1965, he made no secret of his opposition to the battle in Vietnam, decrying US involvement within the battle in ethical and sensible phrases. “We’re combating in Vietnam what could be very in all probability probably the most undesirable battle on this nation’s historical past,” said the liberal Republican, who had earned a fame for standing properly to the left of his occasion—and far of the Democratic Social gathering—on home and worldwide points. “We can not resolve the issues by limitless navy escalation.”
Fashionable
“swipe left beneath to view extra authors”Swipe →
He gained that race, however the battle raged on. So, as Lindsay sought reelection in 1969 in what could properly have been probably the most intensely contested mayoral race in New York Metropolis historical past, he made his opposition to the battle—which was, by then, being waged by Republican President Richard Nixon—central to his bid. His stance was one of many components that price him the Republican nomination that yr. But he fought on, operating as an unbiased and on the previous Liberal Social gathering line, in opposition to a conservative Republican and an solely barely much less conservative Democrat.
As the autumn race heated up, Lindsay’s rivals complained that the mayor’s amplifying of his anti-war stance was a “diversionary tactic” that drew consideration away from municipal points. But, as a Harvard Crimson evaluation of the 1969 contest noted, “Lindsay’s anti-Vietnam statements weren’t produced solely for the event of the marketing campaign; he alone of the nation’s big-city mayors has taken a gentle and unhedging stand in opposition to the battle. His argument is well-rounded, moreover: Vietnam not solely deprives New York of wanted funds, however it makes most partisan scrapping meaningless since all new applications, these proposed by Lindsay and his critics, should have the identical cash.”
Lindsay’s rivals saved complaining concerning the mayor’s strikes to make the battle a difficulty within the race. “However,” wrote The New York Instances, “they misplaced that argument.”
When Lindsay addressed mass demonstrations in opposition to the battle—together with the October 15, 1969, Vietnam Moratorium rally—the Instances reported that “the Mayor bought probably the most enthusiastic receptions of his 11-year public profession—simply as he has been receiving the heaviest applause throughout the marketing campaign when he denounces the battle.”
The Instances explained that the applause got here particularly from younger voters—the identical group most fervently supporting Mamdani now. “However,” the paper requested, “will the applause translate into votes?”
It did. With overwhelming help from younger voters and anti-war New Yorkers of all ages, John Lindsay swept to reelection, ending eight factors forward of his nearest rival. The Vietnam Struggle was actually not the one situation in 1969’s mayoral race, simply as Trump’s unconstitutional actions usually are not the one situation in Tuesday’s major. However problems with battle and peace, and questions of the best way to oppose a dangerously unsuitable president, mattered within the politics of town in 1969. And so they matter now.
Day by day, The Nation exposes the administration’s unchecked and reckless abuses of energy by way of clear-eyed, uncompromising unbiased journalism—the type of journalism that holds the highly effective to account and helps construct alternate options to the world we stay in now.
We have now simply the suitable folks to confront this second. Talking on Democracy Now!, Nation DC Bureau chief Chris Lehmann translated the complicated phrases of the price range invoice into the plain reality, describing it as “the only largest upward redistribution of wealth effectuated by any piece of laws in our historical past.” Within the pages of the June print situation and on The Nation Podcast, Jacob Silverman dove deep into how crypto has captured American marketing campaign finance, revealing that it was the highest donor within the 2024 elections as an trade and gained almost each race it supported.
That is all along with The Nation’s distinctive protection of issues of battle and peace, the courts, reproductive justice, local weather, immigration, healthcare, and way more.
Our 160-year historical past of sounding the alarm on presidential overreach and the persecution of dissent has ready us for this second. 2025 marks a brand new chapter on this historical past, and we’d like you to be a part of it.
We’re aiming to boost $20,000 throughout our June Fundraising Marketing campaign to fund our change-making reporting and evaluation. Stand for daring, unbiased journalism and donate to help The Nation at present.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Writer, The Nation
Extra from The Nation
Chatting with The Nation, the senator hails the “grassroots motion supporting Zohran” as a significant different to “the billionaire institution supporting Cuomo.”
Because the president backs Israel’s long-awaited battle with Iran, his neoconservative critics discover themselves in a clumsy place.
If there’s a silver lining, it’s that blue states and municipalities are doubling down on defending staff.
